From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760097AbYBQMda (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 Feb 2008 07:33:30 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1761168AbYBQMc0 (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 Feb 2008 07:32:26 -0500 Received: from pip23.gyao.ne.jp ([125.63.38.249]:9708 "EHLO mx.gate01.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1761141AbYBQMcY (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 Feb 2008 07:32:24 -0500 Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 21:30:51 +0900 From: Paul Mundt To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: Sam Ravnborg , Andrew Morton , Linux Frame Buffer Device Development , Linux Kernel Development Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: linux-fbdev is moderated Message-ID: <20080217123050.GC7780@linux-sh.org> Mail-Followup-To: Paul Mundt , Geert Uytterhoeven , Sam Ravnborg , Andrew Morton , Linux Frame Buffer Device Development , Linux Kernel Development References: <20080217095443.GA9842@uranus.ravnborg.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 11:36:57AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Sun, 17 Feb 2008, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 10:50:52AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > > While linux-fbdev is subscribers-only, non-subscribers are not plainly > > > rejected, but moderated, so the casual patch/comment/question comes through. > > > > Have you considered moving this list to vger.kernel.org? > > Almost no spam so the moderation is not needed. > > Sounds like a good idea to me... > > Anyone who disagrees? > > BTW, is there an easy way to tell people the address has changed? I.e. > unsubscribing everybody from the sf.net list and letting the sf.net > list send customized messages back to posters? > That's what I did when moving from sf to vger. Any new posts to the old list get an auto-reply with notification that the list has moved and instructions on how to subscribe to the new list. SF policy doesn't seem to allow you to remove the old list entirely, and there unfortunately doesn't seem to be a way to disable subscriptions either.