From: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: Unable to continue testing of 2.6.25
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 22:55:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200802192255.02152.elendil@planet.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080217131611.GA1403@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi>
On Sunday 17 February 2008, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> The real problem is that the kernel seems to lack functionality you
> require for doing some work.
Not sure how you reached that conclusion.
> Why does your work on the Debian Installer depend on VirtualBox and
> can't be done with what the kernel already ships?
Work on the installer does not so much hard depend on VirtualBox (or any
other emulator), but can be done much more effectively and efficiently
using one.
It allows me to run the installer inside the emulator without the need for a
second computer (and using the same keyboard). It allows me to take
snapshots just before stages I'm interested in and then add debugging or
try changes. If what I tried does not work, I can just revert to the
snapshot and try something else without having to run the full installation
from scratch. It allows me to easily test RAID setups without having
multiple physical disks. Etc.
The fact that VirtualBox does not (yet) work for me with 2.6.25 means that
I'm unable to run 2.6.25 on my main desktop and do any real work. Rebooting
my desktop whenever I want to use VirtualBox is just not a realistic
option.
That in turn means that I cannot do any more testing of 2.6.25, because most
of the testing I do consists of just using a new kernel and critically
observing the behavior of my system. As I've caught a fair number of bugs
that way for the past few releases, I'd say that's a useful contribution.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-19 21:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-17 9:25 Unable to continue testing of 2.6.25 Frans Pop
2008-02-17 13:16 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-02-17 19:24 ` Tilman Schmidt
2008-02-17 19:44 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-02-17 20:38 ` Paul Jackson
2008-02-17 20:51 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-02-19 22:41 ` Frans Pop
2008-02-18 2:33 ` David Miller
2008-02-18 11:40 ` Tilman Schmidt
2008-02-18 12:27 ` Andi Kleen
2008-02-19 21:55 ` Frans Pop [this message]
2008-02-19 21:59 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-02-19 22:15 ` Harvey Harrison
2008-02-19 22:19 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-02-19 22:49 ` Frans Pop
2008-02-17 20:46 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-02-18 12:31 ` Andi Kleen
2008-02-18 16:50 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-02-18 17:11 ` Andi Kleen
2008-02-18 17:32 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-02-18 18:40 ` Alan Cox
2008-02-18 18:52 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-02-18 20:15 ` Alan Cox
2008-02-18 18:52 ` Andi Kleen
2008-02-18 18:32 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-02-18 19:18 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-02-19 9:35 ` Andi Kleen
2008-02-18 18:53 ` Roland Dreier
2008-02-18 19:07 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-02-18 19:18 ` Roland Dreier
2008-02-19 19:42 ` Siddha, Suresh B
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200802192255.02152.elendil@planet.nl \
--to=elendil@planet.nl \
--cc=bunk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox