public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: Unable to continue testing of 2.6.25
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 23:49:32 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200802192349.33347.elendil@planet.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080219221914.GL31955@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi>

On Tuesday 19 February 2008, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> The "or any other emulator" is exactly where my question is directed at.
>
> Xen, KVM or even qemu come into my mind, but considering how loudly you
> complained about a temporary breakage for VirtualBox there must be a
> reason why your work on the Debian Installer can only be done
> effectively and efficiently with an emulator module that has AFAIK not
> been submitted for inclusion in the kernel.

- Xen is currently not supported by the kernel Debian Installer uses (though 
work is being done to change that.
- KVM AFAIK requires hardware support that I don't have.
- QEMU is completely useless because of its slow speed without the (also out 
of tree) kqemu module, which does not work when the host system is x86_64 
[1]. Also, I very much prefer the VirtualBox user interface over what qemu 
has to offer.
- I've actually used VMWare for a long time (licenced), but stopped after 
the 5 series stopped working with current kernels and around that time 
VirtualBox became available as an alternative.

Hope that explains.

Cheers,
FJP

[1] http://bugs.debian.org/444160

  reply	other threads:[~2008-02-19 22:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-02-17  9:25 Unable to continue testing of 2.6.25 Frans Pop
2008-02-17 13:16 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-02-17 19:24   ` Tilman Schmidt
2008-02-17 19:44     ` Adrian Bunk
2008-02-17 20:38       ` Paul Jackson
2008-02-17 20:51         ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-02-19 22:41           ` Frans Pop
2008-02-18  2:33     ` David Miller
2008-02-18 11:40       ` Tilman Schmidt
2008-02-18 12:27       ` Andi Kleen
2008-02-19 21:55   ` Frans Pop
2008-02-19 21:59     ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-02-19 22:15     ` Harvey Harrison
2008-02-19 22:19     ` Adrian Bunk
2008-02-19 22:49       ` Frans Pop [this message]
2008-02-17 20:46 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-02-18 12:31   ` Andi Kleen
2008-02-18 16:50     ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-02-18 17:11       ` Andi Kleen
2008-02-18 17:32         ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-02-18 18:40           ` Alan Cox
2008-02-18 18:52             ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-02-18 20:15               ` Alan Cox
2008-02-18 18:52           ` Andi Kleen
2008-02-18 18:32             ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-02-18 19:18             ` Ingo Molnar
2008-02-19  9:35               ` Andi Kleen
2008-02-18 18:53           ` Roland Dreier
2008-02-18 19:07             ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-02-18 19:18               ` Roland Dreier
2008-02-19 19:42                 ` Siddha, Suresh B

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200802192349.33347.elendil@planet.nl \
    --to=elendil@planet.nl \
    --cc=bunk@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox