From: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: Unable to continue testing of 2.6.25
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 23:49:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200802192349.33347.elendil@planet.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080219221914.GL31955@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi>
On Tuesday 19 February 2008, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> The "or any other emulator" is exactly where my question is directed at.
>
> Xen, KVM or even qemu come into my mind, but considering how loudly you
> complained about a temporary breakage for VirtualBox there must be a
> reason why your work on the Debian Installer can only be done
> effectively and efficiently with an emulator module that has AFAIK not
> been submitted for inclusion in the kernel.
- Xen is currently not supported by the kernel Debian Installer uses (though
work is being done to change that.
- KVM AFAIK requires hardware support that I don't have.
- QEMU is completely useless because of its slow speed without the (also out
of tree) kqemu module, which does not work when the host system is x86_64
[1]. Also, I very much prefer the VirtualBox user interface over what qemu
has to offer.
- I've actually used VMWare for a long time (licenced), but stopped after
the 5 series stopped working with current kernels and around that time
VirtualBox became available as an alternative.
Hope that explains.
Cheers,
FJP
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/444160
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-19 22:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-17 9:25 Unable to continue testing of 2.6.25 Frans Pop
2008-02-17 13:16 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-02-17 19:24 ` Tilman Schmidt
2008-02-17 19:44 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-02-17 20:38 ` Paul Jackson
2008-02-17 20:51 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-02-19 22:41 ` Frans Pop
2008-02-18 2:33 ` David Miller
2008-02-18 11:40 ` Tilman Schmidt
2008-02-18 12:27 ` Andi Kleen
2008-02-19 21:55 ` Frans Pop
2008-02-19 21:59 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-02-19 22:15 ` Harvey Harrison
2008-02-19 22:19 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-02-19 22:49 ` Frans Pop [this message]
2008-02-17 20:46 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-02-18 12:31 ` Andi Kleen
2008-02-18 16:50 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-02-18 17:11 ` Andi Kleen
2008-02-18 17:32 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-02-18 18:40 ` Alan Cox
2008-02-18 18:52 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-02-18 20:15 ` Alan Cox
2008-02-18 18:52 ` Andi Kleen
2008-02-18 18:32 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-02-18 19:18 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-02-19 9:35 ` Andi Kleen
2008-02-18 18:53 ` Roland Dreier
2008-02-18 19:07 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-02-18 19:18 ` Roland Dreier
2008-02-19 19:42 ` Siddha, Suresh B
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200802192349.33347.elendil@planet.nl \
--to=elendil@planet.nl \
--cc=bunk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox