From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1764545AbYBTTVs (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Feb 2008 14:21:48 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755635AbYBTTVi (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Feb 2008 14:21:38 -0500 Received: from fk-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.128.190]:46301 "EHLO fk-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752108AbYBTTVh (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Feb 2008 14:21:37 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=sTSsdNp4FF6HjIFnBxRBR7aLKOcXSws3Zt3zzOpo4Qpap/Qx1qO3/hikauolxHERwWQX4fC4VitG8Mj8RHe7xP9YVEd7fjrwTy9uXEte+oa9yfmXqgAycxnq2wUmv6AqLEmcyfYH4GrFyc4N6bxVQbsJGOvqzehCylPN0v1CAio= Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 22:21:10 +0300 From: Cyrill Gorcunov To: Sam Ravnborg Cc: David Howells , LKML Subject: Re: [QUESTION] FRV: linking error? Message-ID: <20080220192110.GD6733@cvg> References: <20080220175145.GA6733@cvg> <20080218200302.GA6741@cvg> <19148.1203512465@redhat.com> <20080220131442.GA18790@uranus.ravnborg.org> <11226.1203531195@redhat.com> <20080220181500.GC6733@cvg> <20080220191937.GB21139@uranus.ravnborg.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080220191937.GB21139@uranus.ravnborg.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org [Sam Ravnborg - Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 08:19:38PM +0100] | On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 09:15:00PM +0300, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote: | > [David Howells - Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 06:13:15PM +0000] | > | Cyrill Gorcunov wrote: | > | | > | > Sam, maybe we should just eliminate this section at least for FRV? | > | | > | You should have a patch in your inbox to do just that. | > | | > | David | > | | > | > Thanks David! I've got them all. | > I think Sam will take care of them to be included in mainline. | | arch stuff like this is preferably going via the arch maintainer. | Sometimes I do all-arch patches but when they are independent | like this one they should go via the arch maintainer. | | Cyrill - I would like you to do the same cleanup for | m32r + mn10300 + s390 | and send the patch to the respective maintainers with a cc to me. | | Thanks, | Sam | ok, I will do it - Cyrill -