From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932938AbYBUUBt (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Feb 2008 15:01:49 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932175AbYBUUB3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Feb 2008 15:01:29 -0500 Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.186]:63118 "EHLO nf-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1763458AbYBUUB1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Feb 2008 15:01:27 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=mpUDQzyhe1Kv7D8nQc+t2GihfqWrQCwJtcM4dZ/rz9xdEYeXxVct/0cKjjwXjG8jSX+rkth7l+z3nPcXT+Jw/7i4b+5mhzm4t52OriPDUW54Sv6FRWkgWLVh2nMv5SaktwFJu6bKs/44o+AQ9FOcaxXSdIoNRnNH1P46Wf7EWEc= Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 23:00:58 +0300 From: Cyrill Gorcunov To: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: cleanup - use PAGE_SIZE instead of numeric constant in boot code Message-ID: <20080221200058.GC6772@cvg> References: <20080221195022.GA6772@cvg> <47BDD698.9000906@zytor.com> <20080221195628.GB6772@cvg> <47BDD820.2050602@zytor.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <47BDD820.2050602@zytor.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org [H. Peter Anvin - Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 11:59:28AM -0800] > Cyrill Gorcunov wrote: >> [H. Peter Anvin - Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 11:52:56AM -0800] >>> Cyrill Gorcunov wrote: >>>> This patch replaces 4096 numeric constant with PAGE_SIZE macro. >>>> Signed-off-by: Cyrill Gorcunov >>>> --- >>>> Text segments of old and new files *are* the same so >>>> it wouldn't break current kernel. >>> NAK. >>> >>> This is NOT PAGE_SIZE (even though the two values are coincidentally the >>> same, for historical reasons.) >>> >>> -hpa >>> >> hmm, why the comment on boot_param structure definition calls >> it "zeropage"? Anyway really thanks for review and catched this. > > Historical reasons... it used to be a "magic page" -- that's long since > gone. > > -hpa > Thanks Peter, my fault. - Cyrill -