From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755208AbYBVPcz (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Feb 2008 10:32:55 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752368AbYBVPcp (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Feb 2008 10:32:45 -0500 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:59410 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752071AbYBVPcp (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Feb 2008 10:32:45 -0500 Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 07:30:43 -0800 From: Greg KH To: Kohei KaiGai Cc: "Andrew G. Morgan" , serue@us.ibm.com, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] exporting capability name/code pairs (final) Message-ID: <20080222153043.GC10954@kroah.com> References: <47BE2A29.4010302@ak.jp.nec.com> <47BE8A10.3080103@kernel.org> <47BE99BC.2060707@ak.jp.nec.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <47BE99BC.2060707@ak.jp.nec.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 06:45:32PM +0900, Kohei KaiGai wrote: > I believe it is correct assumption that long type and pointers have > same width in the linux kernel. Please tell me, if it is wrong. That is correct, it is one of the assumptions that is safe to make. But you should fix the compiler warning :) thanks, greg k-h