Re: bcm43xx regression in 2.6.24 (with patch)

Michael Buesch
2008-02-25T12:19:52Z

On Monday 25 February 2008 13:11:04 Pekka Enberg wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 11:54 AM, Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de> wrote:
> > > Isn't the resolution Michael is suggesting is, "use the different driver"?
> >
> > I have two resolutions. One being:
> > rmmod b44
> > rmmod ssb
> > modprobe bcm43xx
> > modprobe b44
> >
> > The other being: Wait for 2.6.25 and use the maintained b43 driver.
>
> Neither of which seem like acceptable solutions for a 2.6.23 -> 2.6.24
> _regression_. Or maybe I am just too naive to believe Linus' statement
> on not letting the kernel regress...

So, please sign-off the patch that we have, if you think it's right
and doesn't cause more regressions.

--
Greetings Michael.