From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 03/11] slim down debugfs
Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 12:37:53 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080223123753.GP27894@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080219040828.823685054@arndb.de>
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 05:04:38AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> With most of debugfs now copied to generic code in libfs,
> we can remove the original copy and replace it with thin
> wrappers around libfs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> Index: linux-2.6/fs/Kconfig
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/fs/Kconfig
> +++ linux-2.6/fs/Kconfig
> @@ -1001,6 +1001,14 @@ config CONFIGFS_FS
> Both sysfs and configfs can and should exist together on the
> same system. One is not a replacement for the other.
>
> +config LIBFS
> + tristate
> + default m
> + help
> + libfs is a helper library used by many of the simpler file
> + systems. Parts of libfs can be modular when all of its users
> + are modules as well, and the users should select this symbol.
NAK. For one thing, you need dependencies or selects and none of the
patches later in the series introduces them. For another, neither
dependencies nor selects work well if you have non-modular users of
that sucker. Seriously, try to add those and do allmodconfig. Then
look what a mess it produces.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-23 12:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-19 4:04 [RFC 00/11] possible debugfs/libfs consolidation Arnd Bergmann
2008-02-19 4:04 ` [RFC 01/11] add generic versions of debugfs file operations Arnd Bergmann
2008-02-23 12:24 ` Al Viro
2008-02-24 10:46 ` Arnd Bergmann
2008-02-24 18:00 ` Greg KH
2008-02-23 12:33 ` Al Viro
2008-02-19 4:04 ` [RFC 02/11] introduce simple_fs_type Arnd Bergmann
2008-02-23 12:28 ` Al Viro
2008-02-24 10:55 ` Arnd Bergmann
2008-02-19 4:04 ` [RFC 03/11] slim down debugfs Arnd Bergmann
2008-02-23 12:37 ` Al Viro [this message]
2008-02-23 19:55 ` Hugh Dickins
2008-02-24 10:59 ` Arnd Bergmann
2008-02-19 4:04 ` [RFC 04/11] slim down securityfs Arnd Bergmann
2008-02-19 4:04 ` [RFC 05/11] slim down usbfs Arnd Bergmann
2008-02-19 4:04 ` [RFC 06/11] split out linux/libfs.h from linux/fs.h Arnd Bergmann
2008-02-19 4:04 ` [RFC 07/11] split out libfs/file.c from libfs.c Arnd Bergmann
2008-02-19 4:04 ` [RFC 08/11] split out libfs/dentry.c " Arnd Bergmann
2008-02-19 4:04 ` [RFC 09/11] split out libfs/super.c " Arnd Bergmann
2008-02-19 4:04 ` [RFC 10/11] split out libfs/inode.c " Arnd Bergmann
2008-02-19 4:04 ` [RFC 11/11] split out libfs/aops.c " Arnd Bergmann
2008-02-19 16:38 ` [RFC 00/11] possible debugfs/libfs consolidation Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080223123753.GP27894@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
--to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox