From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: ?ric Piel <Eric.Piel@tremplin-utc.net>,
len.brown@intel.com, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
dsdt@gaugusch.at,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
trenn@suse.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use userland-like functions for reading the ACPI table
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 02:31:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080224013113.GA12512@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.1.00.0802231232280.21332@woody.linux-foundation.org>
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 12:45:38PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >
> > As recommended by Christoph Hellwig, even if we can't rely on the userspace
> > firmware loader so early at boot, at least use normal syscall (as in
> > init/do_mounts_*.c). Similarly, use kfree() instead of ACPI_FREE().
>
> So I'm missing a lot of the background here.
>
> I don't think "sys_open()" is in any way preferable to the alternatives,
> especially since it depends on thread-global state (the file descriptor
> table) rather than much more local state ("struct file" that you've
> opened).
>
> I think the calls to sys_open() in init do_dounts etc are very different:
> they really are more about a real kernel-level almost-user-mode thread
> than a core driver.
Well, that's what this code is like aswell. That's why I recommended
to Eric to move it to init/ and make it look like that code. I haven't
quite caught up with the discussion yet, but Eric think moving it
there might not be a that good idea. Having this code in drivers/
even if it's just called in init time is a bad idea, as people will
copy it. Then again using the functions the code was using before
isn't any better.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-24 1:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-10 7:12 acpi dsts loading and populate_rootfs Christoph Hellwig
2008-02-10 7:14 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-02-10 11:58 ` Eric Piel
2008-02-11 13:47 ` Sergey Vlasov
2008-02-11 23:41 ` Éric Piel
2008-02-21 19:02 ` [PATCH] Allow populate_rootfs() to be called early (was: acpi dsts loading and populate_rootfs) Éric Piel
2008-02-21 19:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-02-21 21:27 ` [PATCH] Allow populate_rootfs() to be called early Éric Piel
2008-02-23 19:40 ` [PATCH] Allow populate_rootfs() to be called early (resent, with sob) Éric Piel
2008-02-12 5:37 ` acpi dsts loading and populate_rootfs Christoph Hellwig
2008-02-21 18:46 ` Éric Piel
2008-02-22 8:51 ` Thomas Renninger
2008-02-22 9:05 ` Thomas Renninger
2008-02-22 9:53 ` Andi Kleen
2008-02-23 19:34 ` [PATCH] Use userland-like functions for reading the ACPI table Éric Piel
2008-02-23 20:45 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-02-24 1:31 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2008-02-24 19:02 ` Éric Piel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080224013113.GA12512@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=Eric.Piel@tremplin-utc.net \
--cc=dsdt@gaugusch.at \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=trenn@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox