From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753922AbYBXKqe (ORCPT ); Sun, 24 Feb 2008 05:46:34 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751157AbYBXKqZ (ORCPT ); Sun, 24 Feb 2008 05:46:25 -0500 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.174]:61110 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750991AbYBXKqX (ORCPT ); Sun, 24 Feb 2008 05:46:23 -0500 From: Arnd Bergmann To: Al Viro Subject: Re: [RFC 01/11] add generic versions of debugfs file operations Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 11:46:07 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 (enterprise 0.20080118.763038) Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig , Greg KH , David Howells References: <20080219040435.825494460@arndb.de> <20080219040828.415218298@arndb.de> <20080223122444.GM27894@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <20080223122444.GM27894@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> X-Face: I@=L^?./?$U,EK.)V[4*>`zSqm0>65YtkOe>TFD'!aw?7OVv#~5xd\s,[~w]-J!)|%=]>=?utf-8?q?+=0A=09=7EohchhkRGW=3F=7C6=5FqTmkd=5Ft=3FLZC=23Q-=60=2E=60Y=2Ea=5E?= =?utf-8?q?3zb?=) =?utf-8?q?+U-JVN=5DWT=25cw=23=5BYo0=267C=26bL12wWGlZi=0A=09=7EJ=3B=5Cwg?= =?utf-8?q?=3B3zRnz?=,J"CT_)=\H'1/{?SR7GDu?WIopm.HaBG=QYj"NZD_[zrM\Gip^U MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200802241146.08360.arnd@arndb.de> X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/3rdNOsxvyAp+yeumgJImBwLh6hXcE3yty2tw xE01041Bm8ItUiN0voM67BC1TEfOZhgcj8KKNG9aOLpHPqlyr0 5iSBD7XbsRikQ/+zuZpRA== Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Saturday 23 February 2008, Al Viro wrote: > Ewww - caps, \n... BTW, \0 is pointless here - simple_read_from_buffer() will > not access it with these arguments)... > ... > Please, check the length; sloppy input grammar is a bad idea. Hell, at the > very least you want -EINVAL if input is not recognized... Ok, these two come straight from debugfs, but of course I can fix them anyway. Should I do a fix for debugfs in 2.6.25 first, or rather do a patch on top of the libfs rework? I'd rather not have any semantic changes during the conversion, so it would be better to keep that separate imho. Arnd <><