From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 02/11] introduce simple_fs_type
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 11:55:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200802241155.53861.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080223122859.GN27894@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
On Saturday 23 February 2008, Al Viro wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 05:04:37AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > The most interesting function here is the new "struct dentry *
> > simple_register_filesystem(struct simple_fs_type *type)", which
> > returns the root directory of a new file system that can then
> > be passed to simple_create_file() and similar functions as a
> > parent.
>
> Don't mix "split the file" with "add new stuff", please.
Ok, I'll introduce it in libfs.c first then.
> And frankly, I'm not convinced that embedding file_system_type
> into another struct is a good idea.
Right, that has been one of the areas I've been thinking about
myself without coming to a good solution. One alternative I
thought about is to have the news members as part of file_system_type
itself, but that would cost a bit of memory for every single
file system, and might lead to unintended misuse of these members
by non-simple file systems.
Do you think it would be better to dynamically allocate the
file_system_type and have a pointer in struct simple_fs_type to
it?
Arnd <><
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-24 10:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-19 4:04 [RFC 00/11] possible debugfs/libfs consolidation Arnd Bergmann
2008-02-19 4:04 ` [RFC 01/11] add generic versions of debugfs file operations Arnd Bergmann
2008-02-23 12:24 ` Al Viro
2008-02-24 10:46 ` Arnd Bergmann
2008-02-24 18:00 ` Greg KH
2008-02-23 12:33 ` Al Viro
2008-02-19 4:04 ` [RFC 02/11] introduce simple_fs_type Arnd Bergmann
2008-02-23 12:28 ` Al Viro
2008-02-24 10:55 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2008-02-19 4:04 ` [RFC 03/11] slim down debugfs Arnd Bergmann
2008-02-23 12:37 ` Al Viro
2008-02-23 19:55 ` Hugh Dickins
2008-02-24 10:59 ` Arnd Bergmann
2008-02-19 4:04 ` [RFC 04/11] slim down securityfs Arnd Bergmann
2008-02-19 4:04 ` [RFC 05/11] slim down usbfs Arnd Bergmann
2008-02-19 4:04 ` [RFC 06/11] split out linux/libfs.h from linux/fs.h Arnd Bergmann
2008-02-19 4:04 ` [RFC 07/11] split out libfs/file.c from libfs.c Arnd Bergmann
2008-02-19 4:04 ` [RFC 08/11] split out libfs/dentry.c " Arnd Bergmann
2008-02-19 4:04 ` [RFC 09/11] split out libfs/super.c " Arnd Bergmann
2008-02-19 4:04 ` [RFC 10/11] split out libfs/inode.c " Arnd Bergmann
2008-02-19 4:04 ` [RFC 11/11] split out libfs/aops.c " Arnd Bergmann
2008-02-19 16:38 ` [RFC 00/11] possible debugfs/libfs consolidation Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200802241155.53861.arnd@arndb.de \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox