From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756199AbYBYF3v (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Feb 2008 00:29:51 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752232AbYBYF3n (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Feb 2008 00:29:43 -0500 Received: from hellhawk.shadowen.org ([80.68.90.175]:2128 "EHLO hellhawk.shadowen.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752046AbYBYF3n (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Feb 2008 00:29:43 -0500 Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 05:30:52 +0000 From: Andy Whitcroft To: Andi Kleen Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@osdl.org Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] Update coding standard to avoid ungrepable printk format strings Message-ID: <20080225053052.GB2604@shadowen.org> References: <20080222132612.GA11717@basil.nowhere.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080222132612.GA11717@basil.nowhere.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 02:26:12PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote: > At some point checkpatch.pl would need to be updated to know about this > exception too, that would be the next step. Cirtainly we have exceptions for docstrings, so that shouldn't be a problem if this were accepted. -apw