From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758188AbYB1IIW (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Feb 2008 03:08:22 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753314AbYB1IIO (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Feb 2008 03:08:14 -0500 Received: from relay1.sgi.com ([192.48.171.29]:48521 "EHLO relay.sgi.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753733AbYB1IIO (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Feb 2008 03:08:14 -0500 Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 02:08:08 -0600 From: Paul Jackson To: Ingo Molnar Cc: a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, tglx@linutronix.de, oleg@tv-sign.ru, rostedt@goodmis.org, maxk@qualcomm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 0/4] CPUSET driven CPU isolation Message-Id: <20080228020808.3fd22f77.pj@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <20080228075010.GA28781@elte.hu> References: <20080227222103.673194000@chello.nl> <20080228075010.GA28781@elte.hu> Organization: SGI X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.4 (GTK+ 2.12.0; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Ingo wrote: > nice work Peter agreed > i've queued up your patches in sched-devel.git Before this patchset gets too far, I'd like to decide on whether to adapt my suggestion to call that per-cpuset flag 'cpus_system' (or anything else with 'cpu' in it, perhaps 'system_cpus' would be more idiomatic), rather than the tad too generic 'system'. People doing 'ls /dev/cpuset' should be able to half-way guess what things do, just from their name. -- I won't rest till it's the best ... Programmer, Linux Scalability Paul Jackson 1.940.382.4214