From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hidave.darkstar@gmail.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, fzu@wemgehoertderstaat.de,
ego@in.ibm.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com, niv@us.ibm.com,
dvhltc@us.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove never-migrates assumption from rcu_process_callbacks()
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 20:53:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080228195309.GA29720@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080228195107.GA31203@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
* Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> Hello again!
>
> This patch fixes a potentially invalid access to a per-CPU variable in
> rcu_process_callbacks(). This per-CPU access needs to be done in such
> a way as to guarantee that the code using it cannot move to some other
> CPU before all uses of the value accessed have completed. Even though
> this code is currently only invoked from softirq context, which
> currrently cannot migrate to some other CPU, life would be better if
> this code did not silently make such an assumption.
i've got the patch below queued up already - same thing, right?
Ingo
----------->
Subject: rcupreempt: fix hibernate/resume in presence of PREEMPT_RCU and hotplug
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 16:21:10 -0800
This fixes a oops encountered when doing hibernate/resume in presence
of PREEMPT_RCU. The problem was that the code failed to disable preemption
when accessing a per-CPU variable. This is OK when called from code
that already has preemption disabled, but such is not the case from
the suspend/resume code path.
Reported-by: Dave Young <hidave.darkstar@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Dave Young <hidave.darkstar@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
---
kernel/rcupreempt.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Index: linux/kernel/rcupreempt.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/kernel/rcupreempt.c
+++ linux/kernel/rcupreempt.c
@@ -918,8 +918,9 @@ void rcu_offline_cpu(int cpu)
* fix.
*/
+ local_irq_save(flags);
rdp = RCU_DATA_ME();
- spin_lock_irqsave(&rdp->lock, flags);
+ spin_lock(&rdp->lock);
*rdp->nexttail = list;
if (list)
rdp->nexttail = tail;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-28 19:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-28 0:21 [PATCH] Fix hibernate/resume in presence of PREEMPT_RCU and hotplug Paul E. McKenney
2008-02-28 5:05 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2008-02-28 19:43 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-02-28 19:51 ` [PATCH] Remove never-migrates assumption from rcu_process_callbacks() Paul E. McKenney
2008-02-28 19:53 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2008-02-28 19:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-02-28 23:10 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080228195309.GA29720@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=dvhltc@us.ibm.com \
--cc=ego@in.ibm.com \
--cc=fzu@wemgehoertderstaat.de \
--cc=hidave.darkstar@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=niv@us.ibm.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox