From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Bill Nottingham <notting@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH, RFC, BAD IDEA] /proc/tty/console
Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 12:49:42 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080229124942.fd402273.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080229150730.GA8209@nostromo.devel.redhat.com>
On Fri, 29 Feb 2008 10:07:30 -0500
Bill Nottingham <notting@redhat.com> wrote:
> Andrew Morton (akpm@linux-foundation.org) said:
> > > The attached patch adds /proc/tty/console. The contents of it are
> > > simply a description of the current drivers attached to /dev/console.
> > > For example, a boot with 'console=ttyS3,115200n1 console=tty0' would
> > > yield:
> > >
> > > # cat /proc/tty/console
> > > unknown /dev/tty0
> > > serial /dev/ttyS3
> >
> > I must say that the what-consoles-are-registered problem makes my head spin
> > sometimes too. Seems a worthy objective.
> >
> > However I think that a bunch of plain old printks which are emitted when a
> > console is added or removed would suffice?
>
> We already do that in register_console(), albeit without flags.
oh.
> My concern is I'd like to easily programmatically do something with this
> info - ideally it would be in sysfs so it can easily be used from udev
> or something similar.
That's the sort of information which really must be in the changelog, fully
spelled out.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-29 20:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-27 18:18 [PATCH, RFC, BAD IDEA] /proc/tty/console Bill Nottingham
2008-02-27 18:37 ` Randy Dunlap
2008-02-27 18:52 ` Bill Nottingham
2008-02-27 18:56 ` Randy Dunlap
2008-02-29 6:49 ` Andrew Morton
2008-02-29 15:07 ` Bill Nottingham
2008-02-29 20:49 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080229124942.fd402273.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=notting@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox