From: Joe Buck <Joe.Buck@synopsys.COM>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Linux doesn't follow x86/x86-64 ABI wrt direction flag
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2008 11:58:34 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080305195834.GA17267@synopsys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47CEC3AA.6080709@zytor.com>
Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> >Since version 4.3, gcc changed its behaviour concerning the x86/x86-64
> >ABI and the direction flag, that is it now assumes that the direction
> >flag is cleared at the entry of a function and it doesn't clear once
> >more if needed.
> >...
> >I guess this has to be fixed on the kernel side, but also gcc-4.3 could
> >revert back to the old behaviour, that is clearing the direction flag
> >when entering a routine that touches it until most people are running a
> >fixed kernel.
On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 08:00:42AM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Linux should definitely follow the ABI. This is a bug, and a pretty
> serious such.
Unfortunately, there are a lot of kernels out there already with this
problem, and the symptoms are likely to be subtle. So even if it is true
that it is the kernel that is "in the wrong", I think we still are going
to need to give users a workaround from the gcc side as well.
So I think gcc at least needs an *option* to revert to the old behavior,
and there's a good argument to make it the default for now, at least for
x86/x86-64 on Linux.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-05 20:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 98+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-05 15:30 Linux doesn't follow x86/x86-64 ABI wrt direction flag Aurelien Jarno
2008-03-05 16:00 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-03-05 19:58 ` Joe Buck [this message]
2008-03-05 20:23 ` Aurelien Jarno
2008-03-05 20:38 ` Michael Matz
2008-03-05 20:42 ` Joe Buck
2008-03-05 20:49 ` Jan Hubicka
2008-03-05 21:02 ` Michael Matz
2008-03-05 21:20 ` RELEASE BLOCKER: " Joe Buck
2008-03-05 21:32 ` Richard Guenther
2008-03-05 21:34 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-03-05 21:40 ` Richard Guenther
2008-03-05 22:16 ` David Miller
2008-03-05 22:37 ` Joe Buck
2008-03-05 22:51 ` Michael Matz
2008-03-05 22:58 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-03-05 23:07 ` Michael Matz
2008-03-05 23:10 ` David Miller
2008-03-05 23:16 ` Joe Buck
2008-03-05 23:12 ` Olivier Galibert
2008-03-05 21:43 ` Joe Buck
2008-03-05 21:44 ` Richard Guenther
[not found] ` <738B72DB-A1D6-43F8-813A-E49688D05771@apple.com>
2008-03-05 21:59 ` Michael Matz
2008-03-05 22:13 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-03-05 22:21 ` David Miller
2008-03-05 23:13 ` Olivier Galibert
2008-03-06 0:36 ` Chris Lattner
2008-03-06 0:47 ` H. Peter Anvin
[not found] ` <578FCA7D-D7A6-44F6-9310-4A97C13CDCBE@apple.com>
2008-03-06 1:12 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-03-06 9:17 ` Jakub Jelinek
2008-03-06 13:51 ` Olivier Galibert
2008-03-06 14:03 ` Paolo Bonzini
2008-03-06 14:12 ` Olivier Galibert
2008-03-06 14:15 ` Andrew Haley
2008-03-06 17:58 ` Joe Buck
2008-03-06 18:10 ` Olivier Galibert
2008-03-06 18:13 ` Paolo Bonzini
2008-03-06 18:31 ` Jack Lloyd
2008-03-06 18:35 ` Andrew Pinski
2008-03-06 19:44 ` Paolo Bonzini
2008-03-06 19:43 ` Paolo Bonzini
2008-03-06 20:16 ` Jack Lloyd
2008-03-06 21:37 ` Artur Skawina
2008-03-06 15:09 ` Robert Dewar
2008-03-06 15:37 ` NightStrike
2008-03-06 15:43 ` H.J. Lu
2008-03-06 15:50 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-03-06 16:23 ` Jakub Jelinek
2008-03-06 16:27 ` İsmail Dönmez
2008-03-06 16:58 ` H.J. Lu
2008-03-06 17:06 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-03-06 17:14 ` H.J. Lu
2008-03-06 17:17 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-03-06 17:34 ` H.J. Lu
2008-03-06 19:35 ` Robert Dewar
2008-03-06 17:18 ` Robert Dewar
2008-03-06 17:19 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-03-06 19:25 ` Robert Dewar
2008-03-06 20:37 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-03-07 8:28 ` Florian Weimer
2008-03-07 8:00 ` Andreas Jaeger
2008-03-06 15:57 ` Robert Dewar
2008-03-06 16:29 ` Paolo Bonzini
2008-03-06 17:18 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-03-06 16:14 ` Artur Skawina
2008-03-06 0:49 ` Aurelien Jarno
2008-03-05 22:05 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-03-06 2:11 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2008-03-06 8:44 ` Andi Kleen
2008-03-06 9:01 ` Jakub Jelinek
2008-03-06 15:20 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-03-05 21:45 ` Aurelien Jarno
2008-03-05 21:43 ` Andrew Pinski
2008-03-05 21:43 ` Michael Matz
2008-03-05 22:12 ` Joe Buck
2008-03-05 22:17 ` David Miller
2008-03-05 23:17 ` Olivier Galibert
2008-03-05 23:21 ` David Daney
2008-03-06 14:06 ` Olivier Galibert
2008-03-08 19:10 ` Alexandre Oliva
2008-03-05 21:07 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-03-05 20:44 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-03-05 20:52 ` Aurelien Jarno
2008-03-05 21:23 ` David Miller
2008-03-06 9:53 ` Andrew Haley
2008-03-06 11:45 ` Andi Kleen
2008-03-06 12:06 ` Richard Guenther
2008-03-06 17:34 ` Joe Buck
2008-03-06 20:54 ` Richard Guenther
2008-03-06 20:56 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-03-06 22:06 ` Andi Kleen
2008-03-07 4:56 ` Chris Lattner
2008-03-07 14:09 ` Michael Matz
2008-03-06 9:45 ` Mikael Pettersson
2008-03-05 16:56 ` H.J. Lu
2008-03-05 18:14 ` [PATCH] x86: Clear DF before calling signal handler Aurelien Jarno
2008-03-05 18:17 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-03-06 9:21 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080305195834.GA17267@synopsys.com \
--to=joe.buck@synopsys.com \
--cc=aurelien@aurel32.net \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox