From: Stephan Diestelhorst <langer_mann@web.de>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: davej@codemonkey.org.uk, cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Speedfreq-SMI call clobbers ECX
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 16:05:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200803101605.42251.langer_mann@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080306105603.GL13391@elte.hu>
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > Again, should I provide these patches? This thing just annoyed me for
> > a while as I have been patching it in my personal kernels for too
> > long.
>
> yes, please do keep sending them (and any other patches you might have)
> - it's a real issue on real hardware so we want this fix upstream.
New attempt with full clobbers, note that I deliberatly did not change
the order of the output registers. Real output operands still preceede
outputs used for potential clobbering.
I'm not too sure about the EBP push/pop frame, but as folks pointed
out already, we should not trust the SMI code too much.
Regards,
Stephan
--
Signed-off by: <Stephan.Diestelhorst@gmail.com>
--- linux-2.6.24.3/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/speedstep-smi.c.orig 2008-02-26 01:20:20.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.24.3/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/speedstep-smi.c 2008-03-10 16:02:51.000000000 +0100
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ static struct cpufreq_frequency_table sp
*/
static int speedstep_smi_ownership (void)
{
- u32 command, result, magic;
+ u32 command, result, magic, dummy;
u32 function = GET_SPEEDSTEP_OWNER;
unsigned char magic_data[] = "Copyright (c) 1999 Intel Corporation";
@@ -73,8 +73,11 @@ static int speedstep_smi_ownership (void
dprintk("trying to obtain ownership with command %x at port %x\n", command, smi_port);
__asm__ __volatile__(
+ "push %%ebp\n"
"out %%al, (%%dx)\n"
- : "=D" (result)
+ "pop %%ebp\n"
+ : "=D" (result), "=a" (dummy), "=b" (dummy),"=c" (dummy),"=d" (dummy),
+ "=S" (dummy)
: "a" (command), "b" (function), "c" (0), "d" (smi_port),
"D" (0), "S" (magic)
: "memory"
@@ -96,7 +99,7 @@ static int speedstep_smi_ownership (void
*/
static int speedstep_smi_get_freqs (unsigned int *low, unsigned int *high)
{
- u32 command, result = 0, edi, high_mhz, low_mhz;
+ u32 command, result = 0, edi, high_mhz, low_mhz, dummy;
u32 state=0;
u32 function = GET_SPEEDSTEP_FREQS;
@@ -109,10 +112,12 @@ static int speedstep_smi_get_freqs (unsi
dprintk("trying to determine frequencies with command %x at port %x\n", command, smi_port);
- __asm__ __volatile__("movl $0, %%edi\n"
+ __asm__ __volatile__(
+ "push %%ebp\n"
"out %%al, (%%dx)\n"
- : "=a" (result), "=b" (high_mhz), "=c" (low_mhz), "=d" (state), "=D" (edi)
- : "a" (command), "b" (function), "c" (state), "d" (smi_port), "S" (0)
+ "pop %%ebp"
+ : "=a" (result), "=b" (high_mhz), "=c" (low_mhz), "=d" (state), "=D" (edi), "=S" (dummy)
+ : "a" (command), "b" (function), "c" (state), "d" (smi_port), "S" (0), "D" (0)
);
dprintk("result %x, low_freq %u, high_freq %u\n", result, low_mhz, high_mhz);
@@ -135,16 +140,18 @@ static int speedstep_smi_get_freqs (unsi
static int speedstep_get_state (void)
{
u32 function=GET_SPEEDSTEP_STATE;
- u32 result, state, edi, command;
+ u32 result, state, edi, command, dummy;
command = (smi_sig & 0xffffff00) | (smi_cmd & 0xff);
dprintk("trying to determine current setting with command %x at port %x\n", command, smi_port);
- __asm__ __volatile__("movl $0, %%edi\n"
+ __asm__ __volatile__(
+ "push %%ebp\n"
"out %%al, (%%dx)\n"
- : "=a" (result), "=b" (state), "=D" (edi)
- : "a" (command), "b" (function), "c" (0), "d" (smi_port), "S" (0)
+ "pop %%ebp\n"
+ : "=a" (result), "=b" (state), "=D" (edi), "=c" (dummy), "=d" (dummy), "=S" (dummy)
+ : "a" (command), "b" (function), "c" (0), "d" (smi_port), "S" (0), "D" (0)
);
dprintk("state is %x, result is %x\n", state, result);
@@ -160,7 +167,7 @@ static int speedstep_get_state (void)
*/
static void speedstep_set_state (unsigned int state)
{
- unsigned int result = 0, command, new_state;
+ unsigned int result = 0, command, new_state, dummy;
unsigned long flags;
unsigned int function=SET_SPEEDSTEP_STATE;
unsigned int retry = 0;
@@ -182,10 +189,12 @@ static void speedstep_set_state (unsigne
}
retry++;
__asm__ __volatile__(
- "movl $0, %%edi\n"
+ "push %%ebp\n"
"out %%al, (%%dx)\n"
- : "=b" (new_state), "=D" (result)
- : "a" (command), "b" (function), "c" (state), "d" (smi_port), "S" (0)
+ "pop %%ebp"
+ : "=b" (new_state), "=D" (result), "=c" (dummy), "=a" (dummy),
+ "=d" (dummy), "=S" (dummy)
+ : "a" (command), "b" (function), "c" (state), "d" (smi_port), "S" (0), "D" (0)
);
} while ((new_state != state) && (retry <= SMI_TRIES));
@@ -195,7 +204,7 @@ static void speedstep_set_state (unsigne
if (new_state == state) {
dprintk("change to %u MHz succeeded after %u tries with result %u\n", (speedstep_freqs[new_state].frequency / 1000), retry, result);
} else {
- printk(KERN_ERR "cpufreq: change failed with new_state %u and result %u\n", new_state, result);
+ printk(KERN_ERR "cpufreq: change to state %u failed with new_state %u and result %u\n", state, new_state, result);
}
return;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-10 16:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-05 14:59 [PATCH 1/1] Speedfreq-SMI call clobbers ECX Stephan Diestelhorst
2008-03-05 15:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-05 16:02 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-03-06 8:38 ` Stephan Diestelhorst
2008-03-06 8:51 ` Stephan Diestelhorst
2008-03-06 10:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-10 15:05 ` Stephan Diestelhorst [this message]
2008-03-10 16:46 ` Andi Kleen
2008-03-10 21:26 ` Stephan Diestelhorst
2008-03-10 21:51 ` Andi Kleen
2008-03-10 23:14 ` Stephan Diestelhorst
2008-03-11 9:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-12 15:04 ` Stephan Diestelhorst
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200803101605.42251.langer_mann@web.de \
--to=langer_mann@web.de \
--cc=cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk \
--cc=davej@codemonkey.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox