From: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>,
Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>,
hpa@zytor.com, tglx@linutronix.de, andi@firstfloor.org,
hch@infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 1/2] x86, fpu: split FPU state from task struct - v5
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 13:22:40 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080311202239.GF15909@linux-os.sc.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080311101126.GY25110@elte.hu>
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 11:11:26AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On 3/11/08, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
> > >
> > > * Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > > - extern void __bad_fxsave_alignment(void);
> > > > > -
> > > > > - if (offsetof(struct task_struct, thread.i387.fxsave) & 15)
> > > > > - __bad_fxsave_alignment();
> > > >
> > > > I think removal of such checks needs giving necessary alignment to
> > > > cache. Previously it worked because of __aligned((16)) and
> > > > L1_CACHE_SHIFT combo.
> > >
> > > it's still checked, just elsewhere:
> > >
> > > > + WARN_ON((unsigned long)dst->thread.xstate & 15);
> > >
> > > i'd not expect us to ever align worse than 16 bytes in the future
> >
> > But sysfs tells me alignment of "xstate" is 8 now. Object size is 512
> > which is masking it.
>
> ok - you are right, that needs to be solved then. (object size could
> change anytime someone adds a few fields for debugging or whatever)
Which sysfs file are we referring here?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-11 20:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-10 22:28 [patch 1/2] x86, fpu: split FPU state from task struct - v5 Suresh Siddha
2008-03-10 22:28 ` [patch 2/2] x86, fpu: lazy allocation of FPU area " Suresh Siddha
2008-03-11 9:08 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-11 20:57 ` Suresh Siddha
2008-03-10 22:56 ` [patch 1/2] x86, fpu: split FPU state from task struct " Andi Kleen
2008-03-11 5:07 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2008-03-11 8:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-11 10:09 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2008-03-11 10:11 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-11 20:22 ` Suresh Siddha [this message]
2008-03-11 20:19 ` Suresh Siddha
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080311202239.GF15909@linux-os.sc.intel.com \
--to=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
--cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox