Re: [RFC PATCH] Implement slub fastpath with sequence number

Christoph Lameter
2008-03-12T04:16:16Z

On Tue, 11 Mar 2008, Peter Zijlstra wrote:

> I would really prefer if we defer all this fast path fiddling until we
> have the cpu_ops in place, this all just makes the code utterly
> unreadable.

Ahhh.. Are you are volunteering to take the cpu_ops/cpu_alloc patchset?