From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753880AbYCMSFb (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Mar 2008 14:05:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754390AbYCMSFY (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Mar 2008 14:05:24 -0400 Received: from gprs189-60.eurotel.cz ([160.218.189.60]:54535 "EHLO gprs189-60.eurotel.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754306AbYCMSFW (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Mar 2008 14:05:22 -0400 Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 19:05:58 +0100 From: Pavel Machek To: David Howells Cc: Andrew Morton , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , Ralf Baechle Subject: Re: pm_register() and pm_send_all() Message-ID: <20080313180558.GC4949@elf.ucw.cz> References: <20080312150042.96668bcd.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <21968.1205411497@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <21968.1205411497@redhat.com> X-Warning: Reading this can be dangerous to your mental health. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu 2008-03-13 12:31:37, David Howells wrote: > Andrew Morton wrote: > > > pm_send_all() has just a handful of callers: > > What should be done instead of calling pm_send_all()? pm_send_all is currently nop. device_suspend/resume are closest equivalents. -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html pomozte zachranit klanovicky les: http://www.ujezdskystrom.info/