From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
To: "Alan D. Brunelle" <Alan.Brunelle@hp.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, npiggin@suse.de, dgc@sgi.com
Subject: Re: IO CPU affinity test results
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 14:05:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080314130545.GO17940@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080314123606.GL17940@kernel.dk>
On Fri, Mar 14 2008, Jens Axboe wrote:
> I think that is encouraging, for such a small setup. The make results
> are particularly nice. The hangs are a bother, I have no good ideas on
> why the occur. The fact that it happens on both archs indicates that
> this is perhaps a generic problem, which is good. The code to support
> this is relatively simple, so it should be possible to go over it with a
> fine toothed comb and see if anything shows up.
>
> You didn't get any watchdog triggers on the serial console, or anything
> like that?
Here's something that may explain it - if interrupts aren't disabled
when generic_smp_call_function_single() is called, we could deadlock
on the dst->lock. I think that the IPI invoke will have interrupt
disabled, but I'm not 100% certain.
Can you see if this passes the muster?
diff --git a/kernel/smp.c b/kernel/smp.c
index 852abd3..65808df 100644
--- a/kernel/smp.c
+++ b/kernel/smp.c
@@ -24,12 +24,13 @@ void __cpuinit generic_init_call_single_data(void)
void generic_smp_call_function_single_interrupt(void)
{
struct call_single_queue *q;
+ unsigned long flags;
LIST_HEAD(list);
q = &__get_cpu_var(call_single_queue);
- spin_lock(&q->lock);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&q->lock);
list_replace_init(&q->list, &list);
- spin_unlock(&q->lock);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&q->lock);
while (!list_empty(&list)) {
struct call_single_data *data;
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-14 13:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-14 12:14 IO CPU affinity test results Alan D. Brunelle
2008-03-14 12:23 ` Alan D. Brunelle
2008-03-14 12:37 ` Jens Axboe
2008-03-14 12:36 ` Jens Axboe
2008-03-14 13:05 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2008-03-14 13:41 ` Alan D. Brunelle
2008-03-14 15:55 ` Alan D. Brunelle
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080314130545.GO17940@kernel.dk \
--to=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=Alan.Brunelle@hp.com \
--cc=dgc@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=npiggin@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox