Re: 2.6.25-rc5-git2: Reported regressions from 2.6.24

["Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>]

On Friday, 14 of March 2008, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Wed 2008-03-12 01:41:51, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > [Again, some entries have been closed since yesterday and there's been some
> > regressions-related activity in general, so below is yet another update.
> > It contains a new feature too: the "approximate age" of each regression
> > report.]
> > 
> > This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.24 reported since
> > 2.6.25-rc1 was released, for which there are no fixes in the mainline I know
> > of.  If any of them have been fixed already, please let me know.
> > 
> > If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.24, please let me know
> > either and I'll add them to the list.  Also, please let me know if any of the
> > entries below are invalid.
> > 
> > 
> > Listed regressions statistics:
> > 
> >   Date          Total  Pending  Unresolved
> >   ----------------------------------------
> >   2008-03-12      143       51          41
> >   2008-03-11      141       58          43
> >   2008-03-10      138       66          47
> >   2008-03-03      115       65          49
> >   2008-02-25       90       51          39
> >   2008-02-17       61       45          37
> > 
> > 
> > Unresolved regressions
> > ----------------------
> > 
> > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9954
> > Subject		: iwl3945: not only it periodically dies, it also BUG()s
> > Submitter	: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
> > Date		: 2008-02-05 22:44 (37 days old)
> > References	: http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/5/453
> > Handled-By	: Chatre, Reinette <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
> 
> I only seen the BUG() once. iwl3945 seems to work slightly better, big
> part of problem was CGROUP_SCHED... All problems with iwl are not
> solved, but it probably works as well as it did in 2.6.24 now...

Thanks for the update, I've closed the bug.

Rafael