From: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>
To: Nix <nix@esperi.org.uk>
Cc: clowncoder <vincent-perrier@club-internet.fr>,
user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@timesys.com>
Subject: Re: [2.6.24.x] UML select()/poll() oversleeping reproducibly
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 13:00:19 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080318170019.GA8747@c2.user-mode-linux.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87k5k112kf.fsf@hades.wkstn.nix>
Below is another patch.
I was hurt and disappointed by your
> Eeuuuuw. :)
so I got rid of the 9/10 thing.
This version keeps track of the time between ticks (as reported by the
host's gettimeofday) and adjusts its sleeping and reporting ticks
accordingly.
It's still undersleeping a little - your little test once reported 19
seconds for a 20 second sleep. Otherwise, it's reporting sleep times
that are right on the money.
Jeff
--
Work email - jdike at linux dot intel dot com
Index: linux-2.6.22/arch/um/os-Linux/time.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.22.orig/arch/um/os-Linux/time.c 2008-03-18 12:32:19.000000000 -0400
+++ linux-2.6.22/arch/um/os-Linux/time.c 2008-03-18 12:45:50.000000000 -0400
@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
#include "kern_constants.h"
#include "os.h"
#include "user.h"
+#include "kern_util.h"
int set_interval(void)
{
@@ -58,12 +59,17 @@ static inline long long timeval_to_ns(co
long long disable_timer(void)
{
struct itimerval time = ((struct itimerval) { { 0, 0 }, { 0, 0 } });
+ int remain, max = UM_NSEC_PER_SEC / UM_HZ;
if (setitimer(ITIMER_VIRTUAL, &time, &time) < 0)
printk(UM_KERN_ERR "disable_timer - setitimer failed, "
"errno = %d\n", errno);
- return timeval_to_ns(&time.it_value);
+ remain = timeval_to_ns(&time.it_value);
+ if (remain > max)
+ remain = max;
+
+ return remain;
}
long long os_nsecs(void)
@@ -79,7 +85,47 @@ static int after_sleep_interval(struct t
{
return 0;
}
+
+
+static void deliver_alarm(void)
+{
+ alarm_handler(SIGVTALRM, NULL);
+}
+
+static unsigned long long sleep_time(unsigned long long nsecs)
+{
+ return nsecs;
+}
+
#else
+unsigned long long last_tick;
+unsigned long long skew;
+
+extern void alarm_handler(int sig, struct sigcontext *sc);
+
+static void deliver_alarm(void)
+{
+ unsigned long long this_tick = os_nsecs();
+ int one_tick = UM_NSEC_PER_SEC / UM_HZ;
+
+ if (last_tick == 0)
+ last_tick = this_tick - one_tick;
+
+ skew += this_tick - last_tick;
+
+ while (skew >= one_tick) {
+ alarm_handler(SIGVTALRM, NULL);
+ skew -= one_tick;
+ }
+
+ last_tick = this_tick;
+}
+
+static unsigned long long sleep_time(unsigned long long nsecs)
+{
+ return nsecs > skew ? nsecs - skew : 0;
+}
+
static inline long long timespec_to_us(const struct timespec *ts)
{
return ((long long) ts->tv_sec * UM_USEC_PER_SEC) +
@@ -102,6 +148,8 @@ static int after_sleep_interval(struct t
*/
if (start_usecs > usec)
start_usecs = usec;
+
+ start_usecs -= skew / UM_NSEC_PER_USEC;
tv = ((struct timeval) { .tv_sec = start_usecs / UM_USEC_PER_SEC,
.tv_usec = start_usecs % UM_USEC_PER_SEC });
interval = ((struct itimerval) { { 0, usec }, tv });
@@ -113,8 +161,6 @@ static int after_sleep_interval(struct t
}
#endif
-extern void alarm_handler(int sig, struct sigcontext *sc);
-
void idle_sleep(unsigned long long nsecs)
{
struct timespec ts;
@@ -126,10 +172,12 @@ void idle_sleep(unsigned long long nsecs
*/
if (nsecs == 0)
nsecs = UM_NSEC_PER_SEC / UM_HZ;
+
+ nsecs = sleep_time(nsecs);
ts = ((struct timespec) { .tv_sec = nsecs / UM_NSEC_PER_SEC,
.tv_nsec = nsecs % UM_NSEC_PER_SEC });
if (nanosleep(&ts, &ts) == 0)
- alarm_handler(SIGVTALRM, NULL);
+ deliver_alarm();
after_sleep_interval(&ts);
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-19 20:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <47B34BA0.30006@club-internet.fr>
[not found] ` <20080214003853.GA15952@c2.user-mode-linux.org>
[not found] ` <47B4BDCD.4080605@club-internet.fr>
[not found] ` <20080215160205.GA6082@c2.user-mode-linux.org>
[not found] ` <47B5CE40.9000005@club-internet.fr>
[not found] ` <20080215184650.GA8810@c2.user-mode-linux.org>
2008-03-14 23:01 ` [2.6.24.x] UML select()/poll() oversleeping reproducibly (was Re: [uml-devel] g_timeout_add) Nix
2008-03-17 16:27 ` Jeff Dike
2008-03-17 17:03 ` Jeff Dike
2008-03-17 19:34 ` Jeff Dike
2008-03-17 21:08 ` [2.6.24.x] UML select()/poll() oversleeping reproducibly Nix
2008-03-18 17:00 ` Jeff Dike [this message]
2008-03-18 19:39 ` Nix
2008-03-19 22:14 ` Nix
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080318170019.GA8747@c2.user-mode-linux.org \
--to=jdike@addtoit.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nix@esperi.org.uk \
--cc=tglx@timesys.com \
--cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=vincent-perrier@club-internet.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox