From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Mike Mason <mmlnx@us.ibm.com>,
Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com>,
David Smith <dsmith@redhat.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@us.ibm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Adrian Bunk <adrian.bunk@movial.fi>
Subject: [patch 2/4] Markers - Update preempt_disable. call_rcu, rcu_barrier comments.
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 20:27:39 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080320002834.740774785@polymtl.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20080320002737.918213455@polymtl.ca
[-- Attachment #1: markers-update-preempt-disable-call-rcu-rcu-barrier-comments.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 3014 bytes --]
Add comments requested by Andrew.
Updated comments about synchronize_sched(). Since we use call_rcu and
rcu_barrier now, these comments were out of sync with the code.
Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>
CC: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
CC: Mike Mason <mmlnx@us.ibm.com>
CC: Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com>
CC: David Smith <dsmith@redhat.com>
CC: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@us.ibm.com>
CC: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
CC: Adrian Bunk <adrian.bunk@movial.fi>
---
kernel/marker.c | 19 ++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6-lttng/kernel/marker.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6-lttng.orig/kernel/marker.c 2008-03-19 18:26:47.000000000 -0400
+++ linux-2.6-lttng/kernel/marker.c 2008-03-19 18:30:26.000000000 -0400
@@ -104,9 +104,9 @@ void marker_probe_cb(const struct marker
char ptype;
/*
- * disabling preemption to make sure the teardown of the callbacks can
- * be done correctly when they are in modules and they insure RCU read
- * coherency.
+ * preempt_disable does two things : disabling preemption to make sure
+ * the teardown of the callbacks can be done correctly when they are in
+ * modules and they insure RCU read coherency.
*/
preempt_disable();
ptype = ACCESS_ONCE(mdata->ptype);
@@ -551,9 +551,9 @@ static int set_marker(struct marker_entr
/*
* Disable a marker and its probe callback.
- * Note: only after a synchronize_sched() issued after setting elem->call to the
- * empty function insures that the original callback is not used anymore. This
- * insured by preemption disabling around the call site.
+ * Note: only waiting an RCU period after setting elem->call to the empty
+ * function insures that the original callback is not used anymore. This insured
+ * by preempt_disable around the call site.
*/
static void disable_marker(struct marker *elem)
{
@@ -565,8 +565,8 @@ static void disable_marker(struct marker
elem->ptype = 0; /* single probe */
/*
* Leave the private data and id there, because removal is racy and
- * should be done only after a synchronize_sched(). These are never used
- * until the next initialization anyway.
+ * should be done only after an RCU period. These are never used until
+ * the next initialization anyway.
*/
}
@@ -601,9 +601,6 @@ void marker_update_probe_range(struct ma
/*
* Update probes, removing the faulty probes.
- * Issues a synchronize_sched() when no reference to the module passed
- * as parameter is found in the probes so the probe module can be
- * safely unloaded from now on.
*
* Internal callback only changed before the first probe is connected to it.
* Single probe private data can only be changed on 0 -> 1 and 2 -> 1
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
Computer Engineering Ph.D. Student, Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal
OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-20 0:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-20 0:27 [patch 0/4] Markers updates for 2.6.25-rc6 Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-03-20 0:27 ` [patch 1/4] Markers - depends on not PREEMPT_RCU Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-03-20 19:03 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-20 19:49 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-03-20 0:27 ` Mathieu Desnoyers [this message]
2008-03-20 0:27 ` [patch 3/4] Markers - Remove ACCESS_ONCE Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-03-20 0:27 ` [patch 4/4] Markers Support for Proprierary Modules Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-03-20 5:35 ` Rusty Russell
2008-03-20 12:30 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-03-20 8:38 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-03-20 19:12 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-20 19:18 ` Jon Masters
2008-03-20 22:15 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-20 20:17 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2008-03-20 22:05 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-20 22:24 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-03-20 22:22 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080320002834.740774785@polymtl.ca \
--to=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
--cc=adrian.bunk@movial.fi \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=dsmith@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mmlnx@us.ibm.com \
--cc=paulmck@us.ibm.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox