From: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Yakov Lerner <iler.ml@gmail.com>,
anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com, davem@davemloft.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Subject: kprobes-x86: correct post-eip value in post_hander()
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 17:01:34 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080321113134.GA7620@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080321110804.GY20420@elte.hu>
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 12:08:04PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Yakov Lerner <iler.ml@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I was trying to get the address of instruction to be executed next
> > after the kprobed instruction. But regs->eip in post_handler()
> > contains value which is useless to the user. It's pre-corrected value.
> > This value is difficult to use without access to resume_execution(),
> > which is not exported anyway. I moved the invocation of post_handler()
> > to *after* resume_execution(). Now regs->eip contains meaningful value
> > in post_handler().
> >
> > I do not think this change breaks any backward-compatibility. To make
> > meaning of the old value, post_handler() would need access to
> > resume_execution() which is not exported. I have difficulty to
> > believe that previous, uncorrected, regs->eip can be meaningfully used
> > in post_handler().
>
> thanks, i've added your patch to the .26 bucket of x86.git, but it would
> be nice to get an Ack/Nack from a kprobes person as well.
Ingo,
I've tested Yakov's more comprehensive patch on powerpc too. This has my
ack.
Acked-by: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-21 11:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-16 8:21 [PATCH] Subject: kprobes-x86: correct post-eip value in post_hander() Yakov Lerner
2008-03-17 5:19 ` Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
2008-03-17 10:59 ` Yakov Lerner
2008-03-17 12:39 ` Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
2008-03-17 22:17 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2008-03-18 4:26 ` Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
2008-03-21 11:08 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-21 11:31 ` Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli [this message]
2008-03-21 14:32 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-21 14:51 ` Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
2008-03-21 23:18 ` Masami Hiramatsu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080321113134.GA7620@in.ibm.com \
--to=ananth@in.ibm.com \
--cc=anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=iler.ml@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhiramat@redhat.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox