From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
To: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, npiggin@suse.de, paulus@samba.org,
tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Generic smp_call_function(), improvements, and smp_call_function_single()
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 19:31:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080321183149.GB15355@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1FE6DD409037234FAB833C420AA843ECE137D9@orsmsx424.amr.corp.intel.com>
On Fri, Mar 21 2008, Luck, Tony wrote:
> > When/if more archs are converted, it'll of course look even better.
> > Comments? I've verified that this builts and boots on x86, x86-64
> > and powerpc. IA64 may still need a one-liner change, I don't have
> > access to that platform anymore so I can't verify that myself. It
> > does build, however :-)
>
> Can you give me a clue as to which line needs the one-liner ... although
> it builds cleanly for IA64 it panics with a dereference NULL fault. It
My thinking was that it may need a bit of help to ensure that the init
function for single call data works,
kernel/smp.c:init_call_single_data() specifically. It may be run before
the arch code has setup all CPU related structures, not sure...
> looks like we were in the list_add_tail(&data->list, &dst->list) code.
Is it data or dst being NULL? Looking at your trace, it must be dst.
Which makes me believe that it is indeed a missing call of the above
function at the right time. So some help would be accepted there :)
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-21 18:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-19 11:56 [PATCH 0/5] Generic smp_call_function(), improvements, and smp_call_function_single() Jens Axboe
2008-03-19 11:56 ` [PATCH 1/5] Add generic helpers for arch IPI function calls Jens Axboe
2008-03-19 11:56 ` [PATCH 2/5] x86: convert to generic helpers for " Jens Axboe
2008-03-19 11:56 ` [PATCH 3/5] x86-64: " Jens Axboe
2008-03-19 11:56 ` [PATCH 4/5] powerpc: " Jens Axboe
2008-03-19 11:56 ` [PATCH 5/5] ia64: " Jens Axboe
2008-03-21 9:53 ` [PATCH 0/5] Generic smp_call_function(), improvements, and smp_call_function_single() Ingo Molnar
2008-03-21 13:15 ` Jens Axboe
2008-03-25 8:00 ` Nick Piggin
2008-03-27 10:08 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-27 10:37 ` Jens Axboe
2008-03-27 10:43 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-27 12:02 ` Jens Axboe
2008-03-27 12:32 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-27 12:35 ` Jens Axboe
2008-03-21 18:22 ` Luck, Tony
2008-03-21 18:31 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2008-03-21 18:56 ` Luck, Tony
2008-03-22 12:29 ` Jens Axboe
2008-03-24 16:45 ` Luck, Tony
2008-03-24 20:28 ` Luck, Tony
2008-03-25 8:12 ` Jens Axboe
2008-03-25 16:48 ` Luck, Tony
2008-03-25 18:00 ` Jens Axboe
2008-03-21 20:04 ` Luck, Tony
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080321183149.GB15355@kernel.dk \
--to=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=npiggin@suse.de \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox