From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757905AbYCVSiP (ORCPT ); Sat, 22 Mar 2008 14:38:15 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757481AbYCVSh6 (ORCPT ); Sat, 22 Mar 2008 14:37:58 -0400 Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk ([195.92.253.2]:33505 "EHLO ZenIV.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757423AbYCVSh5 (ORCPT ); Sat, 22 Mar 2008 14:37:57 -0400 Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2008 18:37:56 +0000 From: Al Viro To: Margit Schubert-While Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: gcc change and kernel build Message-ID: <20080322183756.GD10722@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> References: <5.1.0.14.2.20080322183805.02769f00@popmail.t-online.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20080322183805.02769f00@popmail.t-online.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 06:40:03PM +0100, Margit Schubert-While wrote: > Is this - > http://marc.info/?l=gcc-bugs&m=120620193114127&w=2 > going to affect kernel builds? Not unless somebody had decided to use nested functions in the kernel. I'd ran into only one such, er, person of questionable habits and the code in question had been long rewritten in C, IIRC. Somebody might have done that again, but it's not hard to check...