From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: ultrastor.c is a bit-rot
Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2008 17:16:52 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080323171652.GF10722@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47E68423.2010507@zytor.com>
On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 09:24:03AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> >Hmm interesting, so someone took the VGA thing and made a storage device
> >for it. Did that ever happen with AGP? Any AGP scsi cards. I guess I can
> >Google for it.
>
> A lot less likely, IMO. Unlike AGP-PCI, VLB slots were compatible with
> ISA cards, and the electricals were less complex, so several motherboard
> manufacturers built boards with 3 or more VESA slots (I think I saw a
> board with 6 at one point.)
>
> AGP electricals pretty much require that it be point to point.
... not that VLB didn't suck badly with several devices attached at the same
time. I would be rather surprised if that board would work if fully populated
with VLB cards, all in active use. IOW, a likely explanation is that it
had a warning along the lines of "use of more than <number> of VLB cards
at the same time may use instability" buried in documentation and proud
"6 VLB slots!!!" touted by marketing...
I can't find VLB specs online, but IIRC 3 had been the limit and anything
past that had been very much out of spec and likely to screw you.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-23 17:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-17 14:59 ultrastor.c is a bit-rot Boaz Harrosh
2008-03-17 15:23 ` James Bottomley
2008-03-17 16:00 ` Boaz Harrosh
2008-03-17 16:03 ` James Bottomley
2008-03-17 17:01 ` Boaz Harrosh
2008-03-17 17:25 ` James Bottomley
2008-03-17 15:23 ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-03-21 20:41 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-03-23 9:54 ` Boaz Harrosh
2008-03-23 16:24 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-03-23 17:16 ` Al Viro [this message]
2008-03-23 17:18 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-03-17 16:07 ` Alan Cox
2008-03-18 22:07 ` Benny Amorsen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080323171652.GF10722@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
--to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bharrosh@panasas.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthew@wil.cx \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox