public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* What do you want from linux-next?
@ 2008-03-25  3:11 Stephen Rothwell
  2008-03-25  3:59 ` Randy.Dunlap
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2008-03-25  3:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Linus, Andrew Morton; +Cc: linux-next, LKML

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 326 bytes --]

Hi Linus, Andrew,

Now that we are (presumably) approaching the next merge window, can I ask
what use (if any) will you be making of the linux-next tree?
Alternatively, is there any information you want from it?

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: What do you want from linux-next?
  2008-03-25  3:11 What do you want from linux-next? Stephen Rothwell
@ 2008-03-25  3:59 ` Randy.Dunlap
  2008-03-25  4:32   ` Andrew Morton
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Randy.Dunlap @ 2008-03-25  3:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stephen Rothwell; +Cc: Linus, Andrew Morton, linux-next, LKML

On Tue, 25 Mar 2008, Stephen Rothwell wrote:

> Hi Linus, Andrew,
> 
> Now that we are (presumably) approaching the next merge window, can I ask
> what use (if any) will you be making of the linux-next tree?
> Alternatively, is there any information you want from it?

Hi,

I'd like some clarification about the future (use) of linux-next
and Andrew's -mm patch series.  They duplicate a lot of the major
git tree or quilt patch series.  Can we expect both of them to
continue as is or will -mm be a patch series on top of linux-next
or what?

-- 
~Randy

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: What do you want from linux-next?
  2008-03-25  3:59 ` Randy.Dunlap
@ 2008-03-25  4:32   ` Andrew Morton
  2008-03-25 12:38     ` Josh Boyer
  2008-03-25 21:34     ` James Morris
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2008-03-25  4:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Randy.Dunlap; +Cc: Stephen Rothwell, Linus, linux-next, LKML

On Mon, 24 Mar 2008 20:59:42 -0700 (PDT) "Randy.Dunlap" <rdunlap@xenotime.net> wrote:

> On Tue, 25 Mar 2008, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> 
> > Hi Linus, Andrew,
> > 
> > Now that we are (presumably) approaching the next merge window, can I ask
> > what use (if any) will you be making of the linux-next tree?
> > Alternatively, is there any information you want from it?
> 

afacit it's already working.  The level of merge and build errors in the
subsystem trees this time around is a tiny fraction of what it was at the
same stage in 2.6.24-rcX.  otoh perhaps this is because Ingo got tired of
all the complaining and took most of his tree away from me, dunno ;)

> 
> I'd like some clarification about the future (use) of linux-next
> and Andrew's -mm patch series.  They duplicate a lot of the major
> git tree or quilt patch series.  Can we expect both of them to
> continue as is or will -mm be a patch series on top of linux-next
> or what?

There are 60 or 80 "susbsytem" trees hosted in -mm at present:

...
# spi
# mfd
# vt
# kprobes
# quota
# i4l
# i2o
# ecryptfs
# autofs
# rtc
# gpio
# fbdev
# md
# pnp
# ext2
# ext3
# ufs
# udf
# reiserfs
# fat
# documentation
# cgroups
# memcgroup
# cpusets
# signals
# pgrp
# ptrace
# workqueues
# cpu hotplug
# kdump
# dma
# ipc
# ipmi
# tty
# elf
# char
# keys
<etc>

I need to find a way to a) get matureish parts of those trees into
linux-next and to b) base the rest of -mm off linux-next.  I haven't
started thinking about that yet.

There seem to be some trees which aren't yet in linux-next, some of them
significant.  The present list I'm pulling from is

git-acpi
git-agpgart
git-alsa-tiwai
git-arm
git-arm-master
git-avr32
git-audit-master
git-backlight
git-battery
git-block
git-cifs
git-cpufreq
git-drm
git-dvb
git-gfs2-nmw
git-dlm
git-hrt
git-kvm
git-net
git-bluetooth
git-cryptodev
git-ia64
git-ieee1394
git-scsi-misc
git-hid
git-hwmon
git-infiniband
git-input
git-intelfb
git-jfs
git-kbuild
git-lblnet
git-leds
git-libata-all
git-m32r
git-mips
git-async-tx
git-mmc
git-mtd
git-nfs
git-nfsd
git-ocfs2
git-parisc
git-perfmon
git-pcmcia
git-powerpc-merge
git-powerpc
git-s390
git-sched
git-scsi-rc-fixes
git-scsi-target
git-sas
git-selinux
git-security-testing
git-semaphore
git-sh
git-slub
git-sparc64
git-ubi
git-udf
git-jg-misc
git-unionfs
git-ntfs
git-v9fs
git-watchdog
git-x86
git-kgdb-light
git-xfs
git-xtensa
http://ozlabs.org/~rusty/kernel/rr-latest
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/kristen/pci-hotplug
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/tytso/ext4-patches/LATEST/broken-out/
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/gregkh/gregkh-2.6/gregkh-01-driver-core
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/gregkh/gregkh-2.6/gregkh-03-usb
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/gregkh/gregkh-2.6/gregkh-02-pci
http://khali.linux-fr.org/devel/linux-2.6/jdelvare-i2c/
http://kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/bart/pata-2.6/patches/
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/agk/patches/2.6/editing/

which ones are missing?



Do we know if many people are testing linux-next yet?

I had planned on asking patch contributors to base their work on linux-next
when the 2.6.23- and 2.6.24-style calamities reoccurred.  But it just
hasn't happened.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: What do you want from linux-next?
  2008-03-25  4:32   ` Andrew Morton
@ 2008-03-25 12:38     ` Josh Boyer
  2008-03-25 21:34     ` James Morris
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Josh Boyer @ 2008-03-25 12:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: Randy.Dunlap, Stephen Rothwell, Linus, linux-next, LKML

On Mon, 2008-03-24 at 21:32 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:

> There seem to be some trees which aren't yet in linux-next, some of them
> significant.  The present list I'm pulling from is

> git-powerpc-merge
> git-powerpc

PowerPC is included as powerpc-next in the linux-next tree.

josh


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: What do you want from linux-next?
  2008-03-25  4:32   ` Andrew Morton
  2008-03-25 12:38     ` Josh Boyer
@ 2008-03-25 21:34     ` James Morris
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: James Morris @ 2008-03-25 21:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: Randy.Dunlap, Stephen Rothwell, Linus, linux-next, LKML

On Mon, 24 Mar 2008, Andrew Morton wrote:

> There seem to be some trees which aren't yet in linux-next, some of them
> significant.  The present list I'm pulling from is

> git-selinux

AFAIK, this is also in linux-next.



- James
-- 
James Morris
<jmorris@namei.org>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2008-03-25 21:35 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-03-25  3:11 What do you want from linux-next? Stephen Rothwell
2008-03-25  3:59 ` Randy.Dunlap
2008-03-25  4:32   ` Andrew Morton
2008-03-25 12:38     ` Josh Boyer
2008-03-25 21:34     ` James Morris

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox