From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Jack Steiner <steiner@sgi.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
tglx@linutronix.de, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 8/8] x86_64: Support for new UV apic
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 08:38:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080326073823.GD3442@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080325175657.GA6262@sgi.com>
* Jack Steiner <steiner@sgi.com> wrote:
> > > - obj-y += genapic_64.o genapic_flat_64.o
> > > + obj-y += genapic_64.o genapic_flat_64.o genx2apic_uv_x.o
> >
> > Definitely should be a CONFIG
>
> Not sure that I understand why. The overhead of UV is minimal & we
> want UV enabled in all distro kernels. OTOH, small embedded systems
> probably want to eliminate every last bit of unneeded code.
>
> Might make sense to have a config option. Thoughts????
i wouldnt mind having UV enabled by default (it can be a config option
but default-enabled on generic kernels so all distros will pick this hw
support up), but we definitely need the genapic unification before we
can add more features.
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-26 7:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-24 18:21 [RFC 8/8] x86_64: Support for new UV apic Jack Steiner
2008-03-25 10:25 ` Andi Kleen
2008-03-25 17:56 ` Jack Steiner
2008-03-25 18:06 ` Andi Kleen
2008-03-26 2:23 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-03-26 3:22 ` Glauber Costa
2008-03-26 7:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-26 7:38 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2008-03-30 20:23 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-03-30 21:03 ` Jack Steiner
2008-03-30 21:18 ` Andi Kleen
2008-03-30 23:29 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-03-31 2:18 ` Jack Steiner
2008-03-31 2:20 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-03-31 12:33 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-31 12:52 ` Andi Kleen
2008-03-31 18:42 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-03-31 6:48 ` Andi Kleen
2008-03-25 14:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-25 16:31 ` Jack Steiner
2008-03-26 3:24 ` Glauber Costa
2008-03-30 20:41 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-03-30 21:08 ` Jack Steiner
2008-03-30 23:24 ` Yinghai Lu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080326073823.GD3442@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=steiner@sgi.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox