public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oliver Neukum <oliver@neukum.org>
To: Brad Sawatzky <brad+debian@swatter.net>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb-serial: fix regression in Visor/Palm OS module for kernels >= 2.6.24
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 08:17:16 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200803260817.18330.oliver@neukum.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080326023243.GA25564@enigma.swatter.net>

Am Mittwoch, 26. März 2008 03:32:43 schrieb Brad Sawatzky:
> Fixes a bug/inconsistency revealed by the additional sanity checking in
>    commit 063a2da8f01806906f7d7b1a1424b9afddebc443
> introduced in the original 2.6.24 branch.
> 
> The Handspring Visor / PalmOS 4 device structure defines .num_bulk_out=2
> but the usb-serial probe returns num_bulk_out=3, triggering the check in
> the above commit and forcing a bail out when the device (a Garmin iQue in
> my case) attempts to connect.  The patch bumps the expected number of
> endpoints to 3.
> 
> I suppose it's possible that the kernel is identifying 3 bulk endpoints
> when there should only be 2 and there is some issue with the lower level
> endpoint probe?

Send in "lsusb -v". Are you sure all devices have 3 endpoints?

	Regards
		Oliver

  reply	other threads:[~2008-03-26  7:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-03-26  2:32 [PATCH] usb-serial: fix regression in Visor/Palm OS module for kernels >= 2.6.24 Brad Sawatzky
2008-03-26  7:17 ` Oliver Neukum [this message]
2008-03-27  0:15   ` Brad Sawatzky
2008-03-27  2:55     ` Alan Stern
2008-03-27  5:07       ` Brad Sawatzky
2008-03-27  6:41         ` Charles Banas
2008-03-27  8:56         ` Oliver Neukum

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200803260817.18330.oliver@neukum.org \
    --to=oliver@neukum.org \
    --cc=brad+debian@swatter.net \
    --cc=gregkh@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox