From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758760AbYC0MR3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Mar 2008 08:17:29 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756237AbYC0MRT (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Mar 2008 08:17:19 -0400 Received: from yw-out-2324.google.com ([74.125.46.29]:12483 "EHLO yw-out-2324.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755225AbYC0MRS (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Mar 2008 08:17:18 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=GG3Zhuwu2bekKcnuxRJojSPgG9Qkv5dcS+IvxFFVb6DP+I8YZ7Tv4IHFyTJ6tYD6v0IFvG8dq9TTMYU0PP1QGqQJDUCg3xdbmQ8ZmimmDnlyIhGMzyAVLj63UBDXQJzuL95KfPk1C+uo5pfcejsyehdIQ5JFKOd0OOw32ahvr7E= Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 13:22:55 +0100 From: Jarek Poplawski To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Andrew Morton , netdev@vger.kernel.org, bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org, marcus@better.se, Stephen Hemminger , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , LKML , Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 10326] New: inconsistent lock state in net_rx_action Message-ID: <20080327122255.GC2845@ami.dom.local> References: <20080325134320.21525479.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <47EAD8A5.3070806@gmail.com> <20080326171403.ad186037.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080327085542.GA2778@ami.dom.local> <20080327021812.601776b8.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <1206615379.8514.502.camel@twins> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1206615379.8514.502.camel@twins> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 11:56:19AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Thu, 2008-03-27 at 02:18 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: ... > > I bet the net code is wrong and we missed it ;) It looks like you are natural born winner! Congratulations! > How about this: > > > > netpoll_poll() > poll_napi() > spin_trylock(&napi->poll_lock) > poll_one_napi() > napi->poll() := sky2_poll() > napi_complete() > local_irq_disable() > local_irq_enable() <--- *BUG* Yes! I missed it's unconditional here... Great catch! On the other hand, still a question why lockdep doesn't see this every day? Jarek P.