From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org,
marcus@better.se,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 10326] New: inconsistent lock state in net_rx_action
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 22:56:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200803272256.50454.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080327124928.GE2845@ami.dom.local>
On Thursday, 27 of March 2008, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 01:30:14PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> ...
> > My guess is that it is a race between polling the device and irq pushing
> > the packet. That is, normally the IRQ handler wins and netpoll doesn't
> > have anything to do and it doesn't traverse this code path.
> >
> > (although I must admit to being a little out of my depth here)
>
> Probably you're right but there were really a lot of testing and
> stressing netconsole for misterious lockups for quite a long time
> with this new napi, so it's hard to believe this was hidden so
> well...
I assume there will be a patch posted for this issue. Correct?
Rafael
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-27 21:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <bug-10326-10286@http.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
[not found] ` <20080325134320.21525479.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2008-03-26 23:13 ` [Bugme-new] [Bug 10326] New: inconsistent lock state in net_rx_action Jarek Poplawski
2008-03-27 0:14 ` Andrew Morton
2008-03-27 8:55 ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-03-27 9:08 ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-03-27 9:18 ` Andrew Morton
2008-03-27 10:07 ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-03-27 10:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-03-27 11:03 ` David Miller
2008-03-27 11:59 ` Marcus Better
2008-03-27 12:32 ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-03-27 21:44 ` David Miller
2008-03-27 12:22 ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-03-27 12:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-03-27 12:49 ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-03-27 21:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2008-03-27 22:22 ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-03-27 22:22 ` David Miller
2008-03-27 22:39 ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-03-28 0:59 ` David Miller
2008-03-28 10:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200803272256.50454.rjw@sisk.pl \
--to=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org \
--cc=jarkao2@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcus@better.se \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shemminger@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox