From: David Fries <david@fries.net>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru>
Subject: [PATCH 34/35] W1: Documentation/w1/masters/ds2490 update
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 07:27:59 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080328122758.GI3613@spacedout.fries.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200803272343.m2RNhDac017650@SpacedOut.fries.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4380 bytes --]
Provide some additional details about the status of the driver.
Signed-off-by: David Fries <david@fries.net>
---
Documentation/w1/masters/ds2490 | 60 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/w1/masters/ds2490 b/Documentation/w1/masters/ds2490
index 239f9ae..4b7b8ee 100644
--- a/Documentation/w1/masters/ds2490
+++ b/Documentation/w1/masters/ds2490
@@ -16,3 +16,63 @@ which allows to build USB <-> W1 bridges.
DS9490(R) is a USB <-> W1 bus master device
which has 0x81 family ID integrated chip and DS2490
low-level operational chip.
+
+Notes and limitations.
+- The 5V strong pullup is supported.
+- While the ds2490 supports a hardware search the code doesn't take
+ advantage of it.
+- The hardware will detect when devices are attached to the bus on the
+ next bus (reset?) operation, however only a message is printed as
+ the core w1 code doesn't make use of the information. Connecting
+ one device tends to give multiple new device notifications.
+- The number of USB bus transactions could be reduced if w1_reset_send
+ was added to the API. The name is just a suggestion. It would take
+ a write buffer and a read buffer (along with sizes) as arguments.
+ It would add match rom and rom to the send buffer, reset the bus,
+ and read the result. The ds2490 block I/O command supports reset,
+ write, read, and strong pullup all in one command. That would
+ reduce the time and overhead for a set of commands.
+
+ The core w1 functions required to do a temperature conversion are,
+ w1_reset_select_slave, w1_next_pullup, and w1_write_8, which turn
+ around and execute the master functions, reset_bus, write_block,
+ set_pullup, write_byte, set_pullup. Each ds2490 function will have
+ multiple USB bus transactions, except set_pullup where it only
+ requires transactions if the if the time value is different. The
+ conversion could be reduced to w1_next_pullup, w1_reset_send which
+ would call set_pullup, reset_send. The reset_send would enable reset
+ and strong pullup (if enabled), write the data buffer, execute the
+ block I/O command, read status, and get data. Currently I count 11
+ transactions required, this would reduce it to 4.
+- The hardware supports normal, flexable, and overdrive bus
+ communication speeds, but only the normal is supported.
+- The registered w1_bus_master functions don't define error
+ conditions. If a bus search is in progress and the ds2490 is
+ removed it can produce a good amount of error output before the bus
+ search finishes.
+- The hardware supports detecting some error conditions, such as
+ short, alarming presence on reset, and no presence on reset, but the
+ driver doesn't query those values.
+- The ds2490 specification doesn't cover short bulk in reads in
+ detail, but my observation is if fewer bytes are requested than are
+ available, the bulk read will return an error and the hardware will
+ clear the entire bulk in buffer. It would be possible to read the
+ maximum buffer size to not run into this error condition, only extra
+ bytes in the buffer is a logic error in the driver. The code should
+ should match reads and writes as well as data sizes. Reads and
+ writes are serialized and the status verifies that the chip is idle
+ (and data is available) before the read is executed, so it should
+ not happen.
+- Running x86_64 2.6.24 UHCI under qemu 0.9.0 under x86_64 2.6.22-rc6
+ with a OHCI controller, ds2490 running in the guest would operate
+ normally the first time the module was loaded after qemu attached
+ the ds2490 hardware, but if the module was unloaded, then reloaded
+ most of the time one of the bulk out or in, and usually the bulk in
+ would fail. qemu sets a 50ms timeout and the bulk in would timeout
+ even when the status shows data available. A bulk out write would
+ show a successful completion, but the ds2490 status register would
+ show 0 bytes written. Detaching qemu from the ds2490 hardware and
+ reattaching would clear the problem. usbmon output in the guest and
+ host did not explain the problem. My guess is a bug in either qemu
+ or the host OS and more likely the host OS.
+-- 03-06-2008 David Fries <David@Fries.net>
--
1.4.4.4
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-28 12:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <200803272343.m2RNhDac017650@SpacedOut.fries.net>
2008-03-28 12:23 ` [PATCH 1/35] W1: fix deadlocks and remove w1_control_thread David Fries
2008-03-28 12:24 ` [PATCH 2/35] W1: abort search early on on exit David Fries
2008-03-28 12:24 ` [PATCH 3/35] W1: don't delay search start David Fries
2008-03-28 12:24 ` [PATCH 4/35] W1: w1_process, allow wakeup in sleep David Fries
2008-03-28 12:24 ` [PATCH 5/35] W1: w1_process, remove W1_MASTER_NEED_EXIT, it is redundant David Fries
2008-03-28 12:24 ` [PATCH 6/35] W1: w1_process, block when there's nothing to do David Fries
2008-03-30 11:28 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-03-28 12:25 ` [PATCH 7/35] W1: feature, enable hardware strong pullup David Fries
2008-03-30 11:31 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-03-28 12:25 ` [PATCH 8/35] W1: feature, w1_therm.c use " David Fries
2008-03-30 11:30 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-03-28 12:25 ` [PATCH 9/35] W1: create documentation for the w1_therm slave device David Fries
2008-03-30 11:32 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-03-28 12:25 ` [PATCH 10/35] W1: be able to manually add and remove slaves David Fries
2008-03-30 11:33 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-03-28 12:25 ` [PATCH 11/35] W1: recode w1_slave_found logic David Fries
2008-03-28 12:25 ` [PATCH 12/35] W1: new module parameter search_count David Fries
2008-03-28 12:25 ` [PATCH 13/35] W1: Document add, remove, and search_count David Fries
2008-03-30 11:33 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-03-28 12:25 ` [PATCH 14/35] W1: w1_slave_read_id multiple short read bug David Fries
2008-03-28 12:26 ` [PATCH 15/35] W1: w1_slave_read_id from bin_attribute to device_attribute David Fries
2008-03-28 12:26 ` [PATCH 16/35] W1: w1_therm fix user buffer overflow and cat David Fries
2008-03-30 11:34 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-03-28 12:26 ` [PATCH 17/35] W1: w1_family, remove unused variable need_exit David Fries
2008-03-28 12:26 ` [PATCH 18/35] W1: w1_therm consistent mutex access code cleanup David Fries
2008-03-28 12:26 ` [PATCH 19/35] W1: w1_int.c use first available master number David Fries
2008-03-28 12:26 ` [PATCH 20/35] W1: w1.c s/printk/dev_dbg/ David Fries
2008-03-30 11:35 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-03-28 12:26 ` [PATCH 21/35] W1: w1_io.c reset comments and msleep David Fries
2008-03-30 11:36 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-03-28 12:27 ` [PATCH 22/35] W1: ds1wm.c msleep for reset David Fries
2008-03-30 11:38 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-03-30 13:43 ` David Fries
2008-03-28 12:27 ` [PATCH 23/35] W1: ds2490.c correct print message David Fries
2008-03-28 12:27 ` [PATCH 24/35] W1: ds2490.c add support for strong pullup David Fries
2008-03-28 12:27 ` [PATCH 25/35] W1: ds2490.c fix grouping error in ds_write_bit David Fries
2008-03-28 12:27 ` [PATCH 26/35] W1: ds2490.c ds_write_bit disable readback David Fries
2008-03-28 12:27 ` [PATCH 27/35] W1: ds2490.c disable bit read and write David Fries
2008-03-28 12:27 ` [PATCH 28/35] W1: ds2490.c simplify and fix ds_touch_bit David Fries
2008-03-28 12:27 ` [PATCH 29/35] W1: ds2490.c ds_dump_status rework David Fries
2008-03-28 12:27 ` [PATCH 30/35] W1: ds2490.c ds_reset remove ds_wait_status David Fries
2008-03-28 12:27 ` [PATCH 31/35] W1: ds2490.c reset ds2490 in init David Fries
2008-03-28 12:27 ` [PATCH 32/35] W1: ds2490.c magic number work David Fries
2008-03-28 12:27 ` [PATCH 33/35] W1: ds2490.c ds_write_block remove extra ds_wait_status David Fries
2008-03-28 12:27 ` David Fries [this message]
2008-03-30 11:43 ` [PATCH 34/35] W1: Documentation/w1/masters/ds2490 update Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-04-13 23:09 ` David Fries
2008-03-28 12:28 ` [PATCH 35/35] W1: ds2490.c optimize ds_set_pullup David Fries
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080328122758.GI3613@spacedout.fries.net \
--to=david@fries.net \
--cc=johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox