From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: Luciano Rocha <luciano@eurotux.com>,
Michael Meyer <mike65134@yahoo.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: performance differences: "maxcpus=1" vs. "echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online"
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 15:00:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080328140056.GC4404@ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87abkmhgg0.fsf@basil.nowhere.org>
On Tue 2008-03-25 18:16:47, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Luciano Rocha <luciano@eurotux.com> writes:
>
> > On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 02:47:50PM +0100, Michael Meyer wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > what is the difference between booting a dual core
> > > machine with "maxcpus=1" or by deactivating the second
> > > core at run time with "echo 0 >
> > > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online"?
> >
> > maxcpus=1 should turn off the SMP alternative and switch to UP only,
> > optimising some locks and instructions.
>
> CPU hot unplug will do the same. But it is unlikely it accounts
> for that much performance difference.
>
> If he used maxcpus=0 it would make sense. maxcpus=0 disables
> the IO-APIC which likely makes a large difference. But it should
> be actually slower.
>
> There should be actually no difference in theory between max_cpus=1
> and hot unplug to one CPU. Might be some bug.
Or thermal effect. I'd expect that behaviour with bad cooling.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-28 20:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-25 13:47 performance differences: "maxcpus=1" vs. "echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online" Michael Meyer
2008-03-25 14:08 ` Luciano Rocha
2008-03-25 16:38 ` Michael Meyer
2008-03-25 17:16 ` Andi Kleen
2008-03-25 17:23 ` Michael Meyer
2008-03-25 17:49 ` Wander Winkelhorst
2008-03-25 17:56 ` Michael Meyer
2008-03-25 17:57 ` Andi Kleen
2008-03-25 23:27 ` Len Brown
2008-03-26 7:26 ` Michael Meyer
2008-03-28 14:00 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2008-03-28 13:59 ` Pavel Machek
2008-03-29 20:55 ` Michael Meyer
2008-03-29 21:22 ` Pavel Machek
2008-03-29 22:16 ` Michael Meyer
2008-04-02 11:31 ` Pavel Machek
2008-03-29 23:22 ` Bernd Eckenfels
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080328140056.GC4404@ucw.cz \
--to=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luciano@eurotux.com \
--cc=mike65134@yahoo.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox