From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759315AbYC1PC3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Mar 2008 11:02:29 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1758627AbYC1PBs (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Mar 2008 11:01:48 -0400 Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.169]:33627 "EHLO ug-out-1314.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758230AbYC1PBp (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Mar 2008 11:01:45 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=message-id:user-agent:date:from:to:cc:subject; b=X0ocAwnFdlEFUOdvTof4cksBdIy3pCOjyNYx+JnIOR5cZ6VBL0y7fUuvx1q3QTGwPOenxgqWz5RK0PJtQ3ZnE9JmiMAB+UuNrC5OmOePuGN/Y7t4dsjYOh+fBrgLPwIzThTfJuKCGvfDea/+tHirnZ+bIx2+g4gRl99FQgU2/kU= Message-Id: <20080328145655.076024373@gmail.com> User-Agent: quilt/0.46-1 Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 17:56:55 +0300 From: gorcunov@gmail.com To: hpa@zytor.com, mingo@elte.hu, tglx@linutronix.de Cc: gorcunov@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [patch 0/2] x86 flags cleanup Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org This patch series does remove some flags from x86.h. We should better use ones from processor-flags.h Please review (and if it possible, give them a strong test, Ingo) Any comments appreciated - Cyrill - --