From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com>,
Al Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] jbd/jbd2 NULL noise
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 22:25:59 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080328222559.96fb9691.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080329031843.GJ10722@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
On Sat, 29 Mar 2008 03:18:43 +0000 Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 08:15:26PM -0700, Harvey Harrison wrote:
> > On Sat, 2008-03-29 at 03:07 +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> > > Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
> > > ---
> > > fs/jbd/journal.c | 4 ++--
> > > fs/jbd/revoke.c | 4 ++--
> > > fs/jbd2/journal.c | 12 ++++++------
> > > fs/jbd2/revoke.c | 4 ++--
> > > 4 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> > >
> >
> > I had just about all of fs/ done for this sitting in mm.
>
> So send it? I mean, that hardly has a potential to cause breakage - anything
> wrong will be immediately seen on build.
Still, it didn't meet my (and apparently Ted's) is-it-needed-in-late-rc
criteria.
>From a later email:
> You've really got me curious. The latest -mm I can find is 2.6.25-rc5-mm1,
> it's dated Mar 11 and the patches are very much there -
> broken-out/jbd-sparse-warnings-in-revokec-journalc.patch and
> broken-out/jbd2-sparse-warnings-in-revokec-journalc.patch
> resp., all by themselves and not as a part of any subsystem tree.
The jbd2 one went into the ext4 tree.
Alas, -mm's are slow nowadays. Due to a combination of a) the difficulty
of getting it all to compile, let alone boot on sevenish machines, and b)
waning motivation due to me wondering why we merge so much new stuff when
we've just written so many bugs.
My tree is always available at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/ -
it's updated multiple times per day.
>
> Al, still morbidly curious about the akpm's scripts and aforementioned
> message...
The jbd2 changes got moved into the ext4 tree at
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/tytso/ext4-patches/LATEST/broken-out/
hence I dropped them from the mm-specific patches. I still have the patch,
but it's now known as
ext4-mm-jbd2-sparse-warnings-in-revokec-journalc.patch because Ted now owns
it.
> Linus, consider the patch upthread withdrawn.
Whatever. As long as it got merged.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-29 5:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-29 3:07 [PATCH] jbd/jbd2 NULL noise Al Viro
2008-03-29 3:15 ` Harvey Harrison
2008-03-29 3:18 ` Al Viro
2008-03-29 3:26 ` Harvey Harrison
2008-03-29 3:42 ` Al Viro
2008-03-29 3:54 ` Al Viro
2008-03-29 4:01 ` Harvey Harrison
2008-03-29 4:56 ` Al Viro
2008-03-29 5:12 ` Harvey Harrison
2008-03-29 5:33 ` Andrew Morton
2008-03-29 5:25 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080328222559.96fb9691.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=harvey.harrison@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
--cc=viro@ftp.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox