From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758176AbYDAJb4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Apr 2008 05:31:56 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756493AbYDAJbt (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Apr 2008 05:31:49 -0400 Received: from lazybastard.de ([212.112.238.170]:54135 "EHLO longford.logfs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756271AbYDAJbs (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Apr 2008 05:31:48 -0400 Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 11:31:36 +0200 From: =?utf-8?B?SsO2cm4=?= Engel To: Artem Bityutskiy Cc: Tomasz Chmielewski , LKML , penberg@cs.helsinki.fi, ext-adrian.hunter@nokia.com, jwboyer@gmail.com Subject: Re: UBIFS vs Logfs (was [RFC PATCH] UBIFS - new flash file system) Message-ID: <20080401093136.GD7465@logfs.org> References: <47F1EC20.6050600@wpkg.org> <47F1F644.4060000@yandex.ru> <20080401090309.GA7465@logfs.org> <47F1FBCF.2090902@yandex.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <47F1FBCF.2090902@yandex.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 1 April 2008 12:09:35 +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote: > Jörn Engel wrote: > >About a year ago I would have used roughly the same argument. But in > >the meanwhile I have accepted the fact that any piece of flash I'll use > >in a notebook in the next five years will likely use SATA or USB as a > >transport medium. > > Well, Thomasz was talking not about the transport I believe. When the day comes and I can actually use raw flash with a SATA or USB transport medium, I will be more careful and not imply that they all expose a block device interface. Today they do. [ With the exception of Alauda, which has a userbase of about 1 - me. ] Jörn -- It does not matter how slowly you go, so long as you do not stop. -- Confucius