From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
To: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, ebiederm@xmission.com
Cc: mingo <mingo@redhat.com>, tglx <tglx@linutronix.de>,
hpa <hpa@zytor.com>, akpm <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH linux-next] x86_32: fix VisualWS and Voyager kexec build failures
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 10:49:50 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080401104950.83b02073.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> (raw)
From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
cc: Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Both Visual WS and Voyager builds fail in almost the same way (in
linux-next) without this patch:
VOYAGER:
kernel/built-in.o: In function `crash_kexec':
(.text+0x28588): undefined reference to `machine_crash_shutdown'
VISWS:
kernel/built-in.o: In function `crash_kexec':
/next-20080401/kernel/kexec.c:1074: undefined reference to `machine_crash_shutdown'
make[1]: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1
because arch/x86/kernel/reboot.c isn't built since CONFIG_X86_BIOS_REBOOT=n,
so machine_crash_shutdown() isn't available.
This patch does seem a small bit odd since the KEXEC help text says that
kexec is independent of the system firmware.
Eric, is there some other way that this should be handled?
Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
---
arch/x86/Kconfig | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
--- next-20080401.orig/arch/x86/Kconfig
+++ next-20080401/arch/x86/Kconfig
@@ -1094,6 +1094,7 @@ source kernel/Kconfig.hz
config KEXEC
bool "kexec system call"
+ depends on X86_64 || X86_BIOS_REBOOT
help
kexec is a system call that implements the ability to shutdown your
current kernel, and to start another kernel. It is like a reboot
next reply other threads:[~2008-04-01 17:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-01 17:49 Randy Dunlap [this message]
2008-04-02 6:49 ` [PATCH linux-next] x86_32: fix VisualWS and Voyager kexec build failures Eric W. Biederman
2008-04-02 16:56 ` Randy Dunlap
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080401104950.83b02073.randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
--to=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox