From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758135AbYDCOXg (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Apr 2008 10:23:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756498AbYDCOX2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Apr 2008 10:23:28 -0400 Received: from cantor.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:34660 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755109AbYDCOX2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Apr 2008 10:23:28 -0400 Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 16:23:26 +0200 From: Nick Piggin To: Linux Memory Management List , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [rfc] SLQB: YASA Message-ID: <20080403142326.GA9878@wotan.suse.de> References: <20080403072550.GC25932@wotan.suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080403072550.GC25932@wotan.suse.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 09:25:50AM +0200, Nick Piggin wrote: > Hi, > > I've been playing around with slab allocators because I'm concerned about > the directions that SLUB is going in. I've come up so far with a working > alternative implementation, which I have called SLQB (the remaining vowels > are crap). Oh, hmm, I think I messed up a hunk when merging in a patch here... so this version is going to be buggy. I'll repost another tomorrow, so nobody try to test this yet :) Thanks, Nick