From: Ken Moffat <zarniwhoop@ntlworld.com>
To: Dhaval Giani <dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Regression in gdm-2.18 since 2.6.24
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 16:02:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080404150221.GB21753@deepthought> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080404144825.GB890@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Fri, Apr 04, 2008 at 08:18:25PM +0530, Dhaval Giani wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 04, 2008 at 01:37:17PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 04, 2008 at 02:20:00AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Friday, 4 of April 2008, Ken Moffat wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 11:29:21PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Please unset CONFIG_GROUP_SCHED and retest. It is known to cause problems
> > > > > (see http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9969, for example).
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Rafael
> > > > Thanks for the suggestion. Tried it on 2.6.24.4, and
> > > > double-checked /proc/config.gz after booting -
> > > >
> > > > # CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED is not set
> > > >
> > > > Unfortunately, the first test reboot failed in the same way.
> > >
> > > Please unset CONFIG_GROUP_SCHED too.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Rafael
> >
> > Yet again, I'm confused. I thought you'd missed a word in what you
> > asked because the config for 2.6.24.4 doesn't show this.
> > ken@bluesbreaker ~ $zgrep GROUP /proc/config.gz
> > # CONFIG_CGROUPS is not set
> > # CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED is not set
> > ken@bluesbreaker ~ $
> >
> > I _can_ see it in the 2.6.25 configs (except for rc1). Will retry
> > rc8 with them both turned off.
> >
>
> Right, in 2.6.24 we called it CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED since group
> scheduling was available only for CFS. In 2.6.25 we have group
> scheduling for RT as well, so it is called CONFIG_GROUP_SCHED now.
>
> --
> regards,
> Dhaval
OK, thanks for the explanation. Just gave -rc8 the first test with
CONFIG_GROUP_SCHED unset, and again it fails.
Ken
--
das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-04 15:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-03 19:19 Regression in gdm-2.18 since 2.6.24 Ken Moffat
2008-04-03 19:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-04-03 21:08 ` Ken Moffat
2008-04-03 21:29 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-04-03 23:48 ` Ken Moffat
2008-04-04 0:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-04-04 12:37 ` Ken Moffat
2008-04-04 14:48 ` Dhaval Giani
2008-04-04 15:02 ` Ken Moffat [this message]
2008-04-04 14:47 ` Dhaval Giani
2008-04-04 15:00 ` Ken Moffat
2008-04-04 14:37 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2008-04-04 15:32 ` Ken Moffat
2008-04-05 14:40 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2008-04-05 21:03 ` Ken Moffat
2008-04-06 23:48 ` Ken Moffat
2008-04-08 8:50 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2008-04-08 8:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-04-08 11:21 ` Carlos R. Mafra
2008-04-09 13:07 ` Ken Moffat
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080404150221.GB21753@deepthought \
--to=zarniwhoop@ntlworld.com \
--cc=dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).