From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
David Chinner <dgc@sgi.com>, lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
marcelo <marcelo@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: BUG: ext3 hang in transaction commit
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 12:02:42 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080404150242.GA30818@dmt> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080404103450.GC477@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>
On Fri, Apr 04, 2008 at 12:34:50PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> > Max throughput per process = 66393.62 KB/sec
> > Avg throughput per process = 26518.38 KB/sec
> > Min xfer = 44424.00 KB
> >
> > And this is when fsync becomes nasty.
> Could you get for me movies from Seekwatcher (taken on the host) -
> http://oss.oracle.com/~mason/seekwatcher/
> That should confirm my suspicion. Actually, if writing data in the bad
> order is really the problem than my rewrite of ordered mode in JBD can
> substantially help this workload (I can send you the patches if you dare
> to try something really experimental ;).
OK, will record the animation.
Will be pleased to try your patches. Where can they be found?
> > blktrace output shows that the maximum latency for a single write
> > request io complete is 1.5 seconds, which is similar to what is seen
> > under "writeback" mode.
> >
> > I reduced hung_task_timeout_secs to 30 for this report, but vim and
> > rsyslogd have been seen hung up to 120 seconds.
> >
>
> <snip traces of processes waiting for commit>
>
> > As Peter mentioned it eventually gets out of this state (after several
> > minutes) and fsync instances complete.
> Yes, that is just a combined effect of *lots* of ordered data
> accumulated in one transaction (we don't limit amount of ordered data in
> a transaction in any way) and writing them out during transaction order
> in a random order.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-04 14:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-26 23:16 BUG: ext3 hang in transaction commit David Chinner
2008-04-03 10:07 ` Jan Kara
2008-04-03 15:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-04-03 16:15 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2008-04-04 10:34 ` Jan Kara
2008-04-04 15:02 ` Marcelo Tosatti [this message]
2008-04-04 1:27 ` David Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080404150242.GA30818@dmt \
--to=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=dgc@sgi.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcelo@kvack.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox