Re: linux-next: Tree for April 9

[Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>]

* Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com> wrote:

> | > It seems that commit 883a9fc4e5d9b0701f15d4e5a23608f942104721 
> | > ("x86: cleanup - rename VM_MASK to X86_VM_MASK") from the x86 tree 
> | > seems to have missed some places.
> | 
> | i think what happened is that some changes came in from other trees 
> | that reintroduced the old symbols?
> 
> actually, that is the only explanation I could find. The last time I 
> sent you patches to fixup *all* VM_MASK (wich were grep'ed on *latest 
> branch over *all* sources inside x86). So this all were settled down 
> by a few of my patches and /for shame on me/ yours fixups. So these 
> fixups were missed on merging.

no, the problem turned out to be that i kept those fixes too spread out, 
and part of them went into the x86/for-akpm portion of the tree, part of 
it went into x86/testing. Since all x86 developers work against 
x86/testing this was never a problem - only now did it become one when i 
shuffled patches and branch boundaries around. Such problems will go 
away once linux-next starts using x86/testing as well. In any case i 
moved your fixes together and fixed up the patch ordering as well.

	Ingo