Re: linux-next: Tree for April 9

[Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>]

[Ingo Molnar - Wed, Apr 09, 2008 at 05:03:33PM +0200]
| 
| * Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com> wrote:
| 
| > | > It seems that commit 883a9fc4e5d9b0701f15d4e5a23608f942104721 
| > | > ("x86: cleanup - rename VM_MASK to X86_VM_MASK") from the x86 tree 
| > | > seems to have missed some places.
| > | 
| > | i think what happened is that some changes came in from other trees 
| > | that reintroduced the old symbols?
| > 
| > actually, that is the only explanation I could find. The last time I 
| > sent you patches to fixup *all* VM_MASK (wich were grep'ed on *latest 
| > branch over *all* sources inside x86). So this all were settled down 
| > by a few of my patches and /for shame on me/ yours fixups. So these 
| > fixups were missed on merging.
| 
| no, the problem turned out to be that i kept those fixes too spread out, 
| and part of them went into the x86/for-akpm portion of the tree, part of 
| it went into x86/testing. Since all x86 developers work against 
| x86/testing this was never a problem - only now did it become one when i 
| shuffled patches and branch boundaries around. Such problems will go 
| away once linux-next starts using x86/testing as well. In any case i 
| moved your fixes together and fixed up the patch ordering as well.
| 
| 	Ingo
| 

ok, i see, thanks

		- Cyrill -