From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757245AbYDIPTl (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Apr 2008 11:19:41 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757021AbYDIPT1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Apr 2008 11:19:27 -0400 Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.175]:64506 "EHLO ug-out-1314.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756970AbYDIPTZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Apr 2008 11:19:25 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=tRwS1icDoD1wBTgfSUYYk9MvVYFOWm78WKbkAz5QBXCrOkluTlgntFVD4UdfOelsJ1h2kmUa9Zlzot0H9dTbFt7Do/NzrYb5tYt86VT0tU/6lOHMRD1SX2lRZAkls+mh+VQtrdLOYA50GuZ2DeJtGllELMh5OaUyeeOLi5Tw1IA= Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 19:18:38 +0400 From: Cyrill Gorcunov To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Stephen Rothwell , Jacek Luczak , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for April 9 Message-ID: <20080409151838.GC7648@cvg> References: <20080409185309.b94c9d15.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20080409210936.ec8ea986.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20080409212719.7d834c13.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20080409113109.GA25186@elte.hu> <20080409145058.GA7648@cvg> <20080409150333.GA24451@elte.hu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080409150333.GA24451@elte.hu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org [Ingo Molnar - Wed, Apr 09, 2008 at 05:03:33PM +0200] | | * Cyrill Gorcunov wrote: | | > | > It seems that commit 883a9fc4e5d9b0701f15d4e5a23608f942104721 | > | > ("x86: cleanup - rename VM_MASK to X86_VM_MASK") from the x86 tree | > | > seems to have missed some places. | > | | > | i think what happened is that some changes came in from other trees | > | that reintroduced the old symbols? | > | > actually, that is the only explanation I could find. The last time I | > sent you patches to fixup *all* VM_MASK (wich were grep'ed on *latest | > branch over *all* sources inside x86). So this all were settled down | > by a few of my patches and /for shame on me/ yours fixups. So these | > fixups were missed on merging. | | no, the problem turned out to be that i kept those fixes too spread out, | and part of them went into the x86/for-akpm portion of the tree, part of | it went into x86/testing. Since all x86 developers work against | x86/testing this was never a problem - only now did it become one when i | shuffled patches and branch boundaries around. Such problems will go | away once linux-next starts using x86/testing as well. In any case i | moved your fixes together and fixed up the patch ordering as well. | | Ingo | ok, i see, thanks - Cyrill -