Re: [PATCH 6/6] Clocklib: use correct name for 3,6MHz clock

Andrew Morton
2008-04-07T23:03:05Z

On Thu, 3 Apr 2008 17:24:11 +0400
Dmitry Baryshkov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> wrote:

> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/common/sa1111.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/common/sa1111.c b/arch/arm/common/sa1111.c
> index eb06d0b..282a4d9 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/common/sa1111.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/common/sa1111.c
> @@ -627,7 +627,7 @@ __sa1111_probe(struct device *me, struct resource *mem, int irq)
> if (!sachip)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> - sachip->clk = clk_get(me, "GPIO27_CLK");
> + sachip->clk = clk_get(me, "3_6MHz_CLK");
> if (!sachip->clk) {
> ret = PTR_ERR(sachip->clk);
> goto err_free;

Again, there's just not enough information for us (well: me) to be able to
evaluate this patch.

For example, if the current name is "incorrect" then why shouldn't we fix
it in 2.6.25? 2.6.24? etc.