From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755369AbYDJHRz (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Apr 2008 03:17:55 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752273AbYDJHRq (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Apr 2008 03:17:46 -0400 Received: from one.firstfloor.org ([213.235.205.2]:33773 "EHLO one.firstfloor.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752081AbYDJHRp (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Apr 2008 03:17:45 -0400 Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 09:22:18 +0200 From: Andi Kleen To: Zhao Forrest Cc: Andi Kleen , discuss@x86-64.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, yhlu.kernel@gmail.com, mingo@elte.hu, ak@suse.de Subject: Re: Does Linux have plan to support memory hole remapping? Message-ID: <20080410072218.GB10019@one.firstfloor.org> References: <87iqyro3rc.fsf@basil.nowhere.org> <20080409091307.GG19010@one.firstfloor.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Could you please elaborate on Active / Total Caches? The meaning of > other lines are obvious to me. slab keeps some objects ready on a free list for quick access. Total includes those. active are only the objects which are truly allocated. -Andi