public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nadia.Derbey@bull.net
To: efault@gmx.de
Cc: manfred@colorfullife.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	peterz@infradead.org, xemul@openvz.org,
	Nadia Derbey <Nadia.Derbey@bull.net>
Subject: [PATCH 13/13] Get rid of ipc_lock_down()
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 18:17:15 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080411162003.663883000@bull.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20080411161702.460410000@bull.net

[-- Attachment #1: remove_ipc_lock_down.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 4605 bytes --]

[PATCH 13/13]

With the previous patch ipc_lock() becomes lockless.
So there is no need anymore for ipc_lock_down()-like routines.

Signed-off-by: Nadia Derbey <Nadia.Derbey@bull.net>

---
 ipc/shm.c  |   21 +++------------------
 ipc/util.c |   52 +---------------------------------------------------
 ipc/util.h |    6 ------
 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 75 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6.25-rc8-mm1/ipc/util.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.25-rc8-mm1.orig/ipc/util.h	2008-04-11 17:14:32.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.25-rc8-mm1/ipc/util.h	2008-04-11 18:18:44.000000000 +0200
@@ -102,11 +102,6 @@ void* ipc_rcu_alloc(int size);
 void ipc_rcu_getref(void *ptr);
 void ipc_rcu_putref(void *ptr);
 
-/*
- * ipc_lock_down: called with rw_mutex held
- * ipc_lock: called without that lock held
- */
-struct kern_ipc_perm *ipc_lock_down(struct ipc_ids *, int);
 struct kern_ipc_perm *ipc_lock(struct ipc_ids *, int);
 
 void kernel_to_ipc64_perm(struct kern_ipc_perm *in, struct ipc64_perm *out);
@@ -155,7 +150,6 @@ static inline void ipc_unlock(struct ker
 	rcu_read_unlock();
 }
 
-struct kern_ipc_perm *ipc_lock_check_down(struct ipc_ids *ids, int id);
 struct kern_ipc_perm *ipc_lock_check(struct ipc_ids *ids, int id);
 int ipcget(struct ipc_namespace *ns, struct ipc_ids *ids,
 			struct ipc_ops *ops, struct ipc_params *params);
Index: linux-2.6.25-rc8-mm1/ipc/util.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.25-rc8-mm1.orig/ipc/util.c	2008-04-11 18:17:08.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.25-rc8-mm1/ipc/util.c	2008-04-11 18:19:45.000000000 +0200
@@ -720,56 +720,6 @@ struct kern_ipc_perm *ipc_lock(struct ip
 	return out;
 }
 
-/**
- * ipc_lock_down - Lock an ipc structure with rw_sem held
- * @ids: IPC identifier set
- * @id: ipc id to look for
- *
- * Look for an id in the ipc ids ridr and lock the associated ipc object.
- *
- * The ipc object is locked on exit.
- *
- * This is the routine that should be called when the rw_mutex is already
- * held, i.e. ridr tree protected.
- */
-
-struct kern_ipc_perm *ipc_lock_down(struct ipc_ids *ids, int id)
-{
-	struct kern_ipc_perm *out;
-	int lid = ipcid_to_idx(id);
-
-	rcu_read_lock();
-	out = ridr_find(&ids->ipcs_ridr, lid);
-	if (out == NULL) {
-		rcu_read_unlock();
-		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
-	}
-
-	spin_lock(&out->lock);
-
-	/*
-	 * No need to verify that the structure is still valid since the
-	 * rw_mutex is held.
-	 */
-	return out;
-}
-
-struct kern_ipc_perm *ipc_lock_check_down(struct ipc_ids *ids, int id)
-{
-	struct kern_ipc_perm *out;
-
-	out = ipc_lock_down(ids, id);
-	if (IS_ERR(out))
-		return out;
-
-	if (ipc_checkid(out, id)) {
-		ipc_unlock(out);
-		return ERR_PTR(-EIDRM);
-	}
-
-	return out;
-}
-
 struct kern_ipc_perm *ipc_lock_check(struct ipc_ids *ids, int id)
 {
 	struct kern_ipc_perm *out;
@@ -841,7 +791,7 @@ struct kern_ipc_perm *ipcctl_pre_down(st
 	int err;
 
 	down_write(&ids->rw_mutex);
-	ipcp = ipc_lock_check_down(ids, id);
+	ipcp = ipc_lock_check(ids, id);
 	if (IS_ERR(ipcp)) {
 		err = PTR_ERR(ipcp);
 		goto out_up;
Index: linux-2.6.25-rc8-mm1/ipc/shm.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.25-rc8-mm1.orig/ipc/shm.c	2008-04-11 18:13:13.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.25-rc8-mm1/ipc/shm.c	2008-04-11 18:20:44.000000000 +0200
@@ -112,23 +112,8 @@ void __init shm_init (void)
 }
 
 /*
- * shm_lock_(check_)down routines are called in the paths where the rw_mutex
- * is held to protect access to the idr tree.
- */
-static inline struct shmid_kernel *shm_lock_down(struct ipc_namespace *ns,
-						int id)
-{
-	struct kern_ipc_perm *ipcp = ipc_lock_down(&shm_ids(ns), id);
-
-	if (IS_ERR(ipcp))
-		return (struct shmid_kernel *)ipcp;
-
-	return container_of(ipcp, struct shmid_kernel, shm_perm);
-}
-
-/*
  * shm_lock_(check_) routines are called in the paths where the rw_mutex
- * is not held.
+ * is not necessarily held.
  */
 static inline struct shmid_kernel *shm_lock(struct ipc_namespace *ns, int id)
 {
@@ -211,7 +196,7 @@ static void shm_close(struct vm_area_str
 
 	down_write(&shm_ids(ns).rw_mutex);
 	/* remove from the list of attaches of the shm segment */
-	shp = shm_lock_down(ns, sfd->id);
+	shp = shm_lock(ns, sfd->id);
 	BUG_ON(IS_ERR(shp));
 	shp->shm_lprid = task_tgid_vnr(current);
 	shp->shm_dtim = get_seconds();
@@ -935,7 +920,7 @@ invalid:
 
 out_nattch:
 	down_write(&shm_ids(ns).rw_mutex);
-	shp = shm_lock_down(ns, shmid);
+	shp = shm_lock(ns, shmid);
 	BUG_ON(IS_ERR(shp));
 	shp->shm_nattch--;
 	if(shp->shm_nattch == 0 &&

--

  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-04-11 16:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-04-11 16:17 [PATCH 00/13] Re: Scalability requirements for sysv ipc Nadia.Derbey
2008-04-11 16:17 ` [PATCH 01/13] duplicate idr code Nadia.Derbey
2008-04-11 16:17 ` [PATCH 02/13] Change ridr structure Nadia.Derbey
2008-04-11 16:17 ` [PATCH 03/13] Fix ridr_pre_get() Nadia.Derbey
2008-04-11 16:17 ` [PATCH 04/13] Fix ridr_alloc_layer() Nadia.Derbey
2008-04-11 16:17 ` [PATCH 05/13] Fix free_layer() Nadia.Derbey
2008-04-11 16:17 ` [PATCH 06/13] Fix sub_alloc() Nadia.Derbey
2008-04-11 16:17 ` [PATCH 07/13] Fix get_empty_slot() Nadia.Derbey
2008-04-11 16:17 ` [PATCH 08/13] Fix ridr_get_new_above_int() Nadia.Derbey
2008-04-11 16:17 ` [PATCH 09/13] Fix ridr_remove() Nadia.Derbey
2008-04-11 16:17 ` [PATCH 10/13] Fix ridr_find() Nadia.Derbey
2008-04-11 16:17 ` [PATCH 11/13] Integrate the ridr code Nadia.Derbey
2008-04-11 16:17 ` [PATCH 12/13] Integrate the ridr code into IPC code Nadia.Derbey
2008-04-11 16:17 ` Nadia.Derbey [this message]
2008-04-11 16:27 ` [PATCH 00/13] Re: Scalability requirements for sysv ipc Peter Zijlstra
2008-04-14  5:18   ` Nadia Derbey
2008-04-14  7:15     ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-04-14  8:33       ` Nadia Derbey
2008-04-14 10:52         ` Nadia Derbey
2008-04-14 18:54         ` Manfred Spraul
2008-04-15  6:13           ` Nadia Derbey
2008-04-19 23:28         ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-04-21  8:07           ` Nadia Derbey
2008-04-21 14:44             ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-04-14 13:54 ` Mike Galbraith
2008-04-14 15:01   ` Nadia Derbey
2008-04-19 23:24 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-04-19 23:25 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-04-21  5:59   ` Nadia Derbey
2008-04-29 14:35   ` Nadia Derbey

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080411162003.663883000@bull.net \
    --to=nadia.derbey@bull.net \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=manfred@colorfullife.com \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=xemul@openvz.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox