From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754018AbYDLEXT (ORCPT ); Sat, 12 Apr 2008 00:23:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751171AbYDLEXG (ORCPT ); Sat, 12 Apr 2008 00:23:06 -0400 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:40044 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751162AbYDLEXE (ORCPT ); Sat, 12 Apr 2008 00:23:04 -0400 Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 21:22:22 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Adrian Bunk Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.25-rc8-mm2 Message-Id: <20080411212222.b3c1177e.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20080411134036.GB3821@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi> References: <20080410203354.f0a6f464.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080411134036.GB3821@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.8 (GTK+ 2.12.5; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 11 Apr 2008 16:40:36 +0300 Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 08:33:54PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > >... > > Changes since 2.6.25-rc8-mm1: > >... > > +ext4-is-busted-on-m68k.patch > > > > ext4 doesn't build on m68k > >... > > Is this due to the generic_find_next_le_bit compile error I reported as > 2.6.25 regression (there seems to be some discussion recently how to > fix it - hopefully for 2.6.25) or is there even more breakage in -mm? Yes, it's the bitops screwup. I saw some related linux-ext4 email float past yesterday, so something might be happening.