From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759290AbYDLFLe (ORCPT ); Sat, 12 Apr 2008 01:11:34 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1758230AbYDLFLI (ORCPT ); Sat, 12 Apr 2008 01:11:08 -0400 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:39570 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758123AbYDLFLG (ORCPT ); Sat, 12 Apr 2008 01:11:06 -0400 Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 22:11:02 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: "Miles Lane" Cc: LKML , len.brown@intel.com, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.25-rc8-mm2 -- initcall acpi_init+0x0/0x216() returned with preemption imbalance Message-Id: <20080411221102.dc2d8c7d.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.8 (GTK+ 2.12.5; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 11 Apr 2008 15:41:17 -0400 "Miles Lane" wrote: > Is this indicative of a kernel or hardware problem? > > [ 0.279606] ACPI: Using IOAPIC for interrupt routing > [ 0.279789] initcall acpi_init+0x0/0x216() returned with preemption imbalance > [ 0.330789] ACPI: PCI Root Bridge [PCI0] (0000:00) > That's a software bug. Something under acpi_init() has mismatched preempt_disable/preempt_enable or mismatched spin_lock/spin_unlock, etc.